Terrestrial Bioinspired Robots: Biological Models, Locomotion Modes and a Review of Technological Progress

Terrestrial bioinspired robots emulate the locomotion strategies of land animals and have potential applications in disaster response, planetary exploration, and inspection of complex terrain. This review examines the biological basis of six representative locomotion modes: multi-legged walking and running, elastic jumping, ground-coupled gliding, interface-mediated climbing, peristaltic crawling, and adaptive morphogenesis. It introduces dimensionless descriptors of their kinematics, with explicit reference scales for periodic motion and one-off events. We use morphology-function correspondence to compare representative multi-legged, quadrupedal, jumping, gliding, climbing/peristaltic, and multimodal robots with respect to mechanisms, actuation, sensing, control, quantitative performance, and application scenarios. The cited demonstrations range from laboratory mechanisms to selected quadrupedal field applications; their heterogeneous validation records do not support class-wide numerical readiness ratings. Incomplete reporting of sensing and endurance also limits comparison. The review identifies task-specific co-design needs, with sensing architectures matched to the contact and transition variables that must be regulated in each locomotion mode.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26216991
Primary Topic
Robotic Locomotion and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Terrestrial Bioinspired Robots: Biological Models, Locomotion Modes and a Review of Technological Progress

Shengyong Xu, Liang Wu
Sensors
Robotic Locomotion and Control
article

Terrestrial Bioinspired Robots: Biological Models, Locomotion Modes and a Review of Technological Progress

Shengyong Xu, Liang Wu
article en

Abstract

Terrestrial bioinspired robots emulate the locomotion strategies of land animals and have potential applications in disaster response, planetary exploration, and inspection of complex terrain. This review examines the biological basis of six representative locomotion modes: multi-legged walking and running, elastic jumping, ground-coupled gliding, interface-mediated climbing, peristaltic crawling, and adaptive morphogenesis. It introduces dimensionless descriptors of their kinematics, with explicit reference scales for periodic motion and one-off events. We use morphology-function correspondence to compare representative multi-legged, quadrupedal, jumping, gliding, climbing/peristaltic, and multimodal robots with respect to mechanisms, actuation, sensing, control, quantitative performance, and application scenarios. The cited demonstrations range from laboratory mechanisms to selected quadrupedal field applications; their heterogeneous validation records do not support class-wide numerical readiness ratings. Incomplete reporting of sensing and endurance also limits comparison. The review identifies task-specific co-design needs, with sensing architectures matched to the contact and transition variables that must be regulated in each locomotion mode.

SensorsVol. 26(21)
Peking University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Robotic Locomotion and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon