Not-only-cognitive and more-than-cognitive humanities

This article offers a partial summary of the project titled Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Humanities and the Axiological Nature of Acts of Understanding. The axiological dimension of understanding is examined in relation to the identity of the humanities, which are becoming increasingly fragmented. I approach this issue through the distinction proposed by Stanisław Pietraszko, who argued for a distinction between the cognitive and non-cognitive humanities.This article presents examples of both types of humanities, highlighting not only the differences but also the similarities between them. I argue that it is still possible to speak of the humanities as a unified field and, in order to capture their unity in diversity, propose the terms “not-only-cognitive humanities” and “more-than-cognitive humanities.” I conclude by suggesting that Pietraszko’s axiological theory of culture, reinterpreted within the framework of cultural ontology, can provide a research perspective for studying the cultures that shape the practice of the humanities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prace Kulturoznawcze
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19195/0860-6668.30.1.7
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Not-only-cognitive and more-than-cognitive humanities

Marcin Maria Bogusławski
Prace Kulturoznawcze
Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities
article

Not-only-cognitive and more-than-cognitive humanities

Marcin Maria Bogusławski
article en

Abstract

This article offers a partial summary of the project titled Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Humanities and the Axiological Nature of Acts of Understanding. The axiological dimension of understanding is examined in relation to the identity of the humanities, which are becoming increasingly fragmented. I approach this issue through the distinction proposed by Stanisław Pietraszko, who argued for a distinction between the cognitive and non-cognitive humanities.This article presents examples of both types of humanities, highlighting not only the differences but also the similarities between them. I argue that it is still possible to speak of the humanities as a unified field and, in order to capture their unity in diversity, propose the terms “not-only-cognitive humanities” and “more-than-cognitive humanities.” I conclude by suggesting that Pietraszko’s axiological theory of culture, reinterpreted within the framework of cultural ontology, can provide a research perspective for studying the cultures that shape the practice of the humanities.

Prace KulturoznawczeVol. 30(1)
University of Łódź (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon