Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Instructional Practices Scale: Assessing Teachers’ Self-Reported Classroom Instructional Practices

The aim of this study is to develop a measurement tool that assesses teachers' self-reports regarding their classroom teaching practices and to examine the psychometric properties of the developed Instructional Practices Scale (IPS). The Instructional Practices Scale (IPS), developed for this purpose, demonstrated a five-factor structure consisting of 27 items based on Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The identified dimensions are Learner-centered Instruction and Assessment, Teacher-centered Pedagogical Practices, Interpersonal Relations, Planning and Preparation, and Climate and Discipline. The model explained 58.46% of the total variance, and reliability coefficients for all dimensions were found to be above acceptable thresholds.Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) results indicated that the five-factor model showed an acceptable level of fit to the data. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity further supported the structural validity of the scale. Additionally, Multi-Group CFA was conducted to examine measurement invariance across Turkish and Albanian language groups. The findings demonstrated configural and metric invariance, as well as partial scalar invariance, indicating that the scale can be used for meaningful comparisons across these groups.The results revealed a clear distinction between learner-centered and teacher-centered instructional approaches, with a negative relationship between these dimensions. Furthermore, learner-centered practices were positively associated with interpersonal relations, while negatively related to discipline-oriented approaches.In conclusion, the IPS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers’ self-reported instructional performance in classroom settings. However, future studies are recommended to test the scale across different cultural contexts and to support self-report data with additional data sources such as student evaluations or observational measures. Received: 22 April 2026 / Accepted: 22 October 2026 / Published: November 2026

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational and Social Research
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2026-0452
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Instructional Practices Scale: Assessing Teachers’ Self-Reported Classroom Instructional Practices

Shemsi Morına, Erdoğan Tezci, Serdan Kervan, Esen Spahi Kovaç
Journal of Educational and Social Research
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Instructional Practices Scale: Assessing Teachers’ Self-Reported Classroom Instructional Practices

Shemsi Morına, Erdoğan Tezci, Serdan Kervan, Esen Spahi Kovaç
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a measurement tool that assesses teachers' self-reports regarding their classroom teaching practices and to examine the psychometric properties of the developed Instructional Practices Scale (IPS). The Instructional Practices Scale (IPS), developed for this purpose, demonstrated a five-factor structure consisting of 27 items based on Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The identified dimensions are Learner-centered Instruction and Assessment, Teacher-centered Pedagogical Practices, Interpersonal Relations, Planning and Preparation, and Climate and Discipline. The model explained 58.46% of the total variance, and reliability coefficients for all dimensions were found to be above acceptable thresholds.Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) results indicated that the five-factor model showed an acceptable level of fit to the data. Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity further supported the structural validity of the scale. Additionally, Multi-Group CFA was conducted to examine measurement invariance across Turkish and Albanian language groups. The findings demonstrated configural and metric invariance, as well as partial scalar invariance, indicating that the scale can be used for meaningful comparisons across these groups.The results revealed a clear distinction between learner-centered and teacher-centered instructional approaches, with a negative relationship between these dimensions. Furthermore, learner-centered practices were positively associated with interpersonal relations, while negatively related to discipline-oriented approaches.In conclusion, the IPS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing teachers’ self-reported instructional performance in classroom settings. However, future studies are recommended to test the scale across different cultural contexts and to support self-report data with additional data sources such as student evaluations or observational measures. Received: 22 April 2026 / Accepted: 22 October 2026 / Published: November 2026

Journal of Educational and Social ResearchVol. 16(6)
Balıkesir University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon