Fidelity limits and purity requirements for entanglement swapping with one auxiliary photon

Internal-state mismatch limits heralded entanglement swapping. We determine the limits of using one independent auxiliary photon (a helper) with passive optics acting identically on every internal state, complete photon counting and deterministic local recovery. For pure data states of overlap $0<c<1$, put $t=1-c$. Optimizing over the helper and all allowed finite networks reduces the minimum Bell error from $(1-c^2)/2\sim t$ without a helper to $t^2/(2-c+2c^2)\sim t^2/3$. Attaining this minimum requires a pure midpoint helper and three equally spaced logical Bloch directions (a trine); the largest single-record probability at equality is $(2-c+2c^2)/72$. For a mixed helper supported on the data-state span, let its eigenvalues be $(1\pm r)/2$ and $\eta=1-r$. Under a complete-record probability floor $p\ge p_0$, with fixed $0<p_0<1/64$, the optimal error has order $\min\{t^2+\eta,t\sqrt{t+\eta}\}$ as $t,\eta\to0$. Quadratic suppression is possible precisely when $\eta=O(t^2)$, requiring an ideal Hong--Ou--Mandel helper self-visibility deficit of quadratic or smaller order in the data-visibility deficit. When $\eta$ is proportional to $t$, exchange-invariant helpers leave linear error, whereas a tilted helper and a real eight-mode network attain the optimal order $t^{3/2}$. The converse follows from compatibility of the optical amplitudes shared by all photon assignments. The same order holds for local unitaries, deterministic local operations and classical communication, and deterministic separable recovery, and for the average over a bounded number of accepted records at nonvanishing total acceptance probability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23976048
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Fidelity limits and purity requirements for entanglement swapping with one auxiliary photon

Annan Chen
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Information and Cryptography
preprint

Fidelity limits and purity requirements for entanglement swapping with one auxiliary photon

Annan Chen
preprint en

Abstract

Internal-state mismatch limits heralded entanglement swapping. We determine the limits of using one independent auxiliary photon (a helper) with passive optics acting identically on every internal state, complete photon counting and deterministic local recovery. For pure data states of overlap $0<c<1$, put $t=1-c$. Optimizing over the helper and all allowed finite networks reduces the minimum Bell error from $(1-c^2)/2\sim t$ without a helper to $t^2/(2-c+2c^2)\sim t^2/3$. Attaining this minimum requires a pure midpoint helper and three equally spaced logical Bloch directions (a trine); the largest single-record probability at equality is $(2-c+2c^2)/72$. For a mixed helper supported on the data-state span, let its eigenvalues be $(1\pm r)/2$ and $\eta=1-r$. Under a complete-record probability floor $p\ge p_0$, with fixed $0<p_0<1/64$, the optimal error has order $\min\{t^2+\eta,t\sqrt{t+\eta}\}$ as $t,\eta\to0$. Quadratic suppression is possible precisely when $\eta=O(t^2)$, requiring an ideal Hong--Ou--Mandel helper self-visibility deficit of quadratic or smaller order in the data-visibility deficit. When $\eta$ is proportional to $t$, exchange-invariant helpers leave linear error, whereas a tilted helper and a real eight-mode network attain the optimal order $t^{3/2}$. The converse follows from compatibility of the optical amplitudes shared by all photon assignments. The same order holds for local unitaries, deterministic local operations and classical communication, and deterministic separable recovery, and for the average over a bounded number of accepted records at nonvanishing total acceptance probability.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Imperial College London (GB)
Quantum Information and Cryptography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon