From Adoption to Use Intensity: Farm Machinery Use and Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being in Rural China

Agricultural mechanization reshapes production, yet its relationship with farmers’ subjective well-being remains unclear. Using data from 2079 crop-producing households in the 2020 China Rural Revitalization Survey, this study measures farm machinery use intensity as the mean mechanized area share across five production stages, incorporating household-owned machinery and outsourced services. Ordered logit estimates indicate a positive association that persists across alternative estimators and measures. Based on the average marginal effect, a one-standard-deviation increase in intensity corresponds, as a local approximation, to a 5.1-percentage-point higher probability of reporting “very happy.” Higher machinery use intensity is associated with lower household farm labor input per mu, higher per capita household income, and better self-rated health. Interaction tests support a stronger positive association among larger-scale households but do not establish differences by livestock production or age. These findings extend mechanization assessment from adoption to actual use intensity and highlight household welfare alongside production outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16212419
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

From Adoption to Use Intensity: Farm Machinery Use and Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being in Rural China

Peng Yuan, Meng Zhang, Shixing Zheng, Wenqi Wang
Agriculture
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

From Adoption to Use Intensity: Farm Machinery Use and Farmers’ Subjective Well-Being in Rural China

Peng Yuan, Meng Zhang, Shixing Zheng, Wenqi Wang
article en

Abstract

Agricultural mechanization reshapes production, yet its relationship with farmers’ subjective well-being remains unclear. Using data from 2079 crop-producing households in the 2020 China Rural Revitalization Survey, this study measures farm machinery use intensity as the mean mechanized area share across five production stages, incorporating household-owned machinery and outsourced services. Ordered logit estimates indicate a positive association that persists across alternative estimators and measures. Based on the average marginal effect, a one-standard-deviation increase in intensity corresponds, as a local approximation, to a 5.1-percentage-point higher probability of reporting “very happy.” Higher machinery use intensity is associated with lower household farm labor input per mu, higher per capita household income, and better self-rated health. Interaction tests support a stronger positive association among larger-scale households but do not establish differences by livestock production or age. These findings extend mechanization assessment from adoption to actual use intensity and highlight household welfare alongside production outcomes.

AgricultureVol. 16(21)
Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon