Mathematical Framework for Dynamic Downside-Minimizing Portfolio with Exotic Option Overlay

Abstract This study develops and evaluates a dynamic downside-minimizing portfolio through five stages. Starting with a 4-asset universe of equity, bonds, gold, and a volatility instrument, the portfolio is expanded to 13 and then 21 assets while incorporating mean-semivariance optimization, Asian arithmetic-average puts, American puts valued with Longstaff–Schwartz Least-Squares Monte Carlo, covered calls, momentum tilts, and regime-aware rebalancing. The final stage targets a 15% expected return. Portfolio performance is evaluated using correlated Geometric Brownian Motion with 20,000 Monte Carlo paths over a one-year horizon. The four-asset semivariance-optimized portfolio has a Sortino ratio of 2.04 and a maximum simulated loss of −23.7%, compared with 1.20 and −45.9% for SPY. Adding Asian and American puts increases the Sortino ratio to 2.26 and reduces maximum simulated loss to −8.8%. The 13-asset buy-and-hold portfolio reaches a mean Sortino ratio of 5.81. Among the rebalancing strategies tested, calendar rebalancing produced the highest mean Sortino ratio of 9.62. The 21-asset portfolio with a 15% return target has a Sortino ratio of 4.06 and maximum simulated loss of −28.8%; the full option overlay reduces the latter to −9.1%. These results characterize the tradeoffs among diversification, downside protection, return targets, and adaptive rebalancing within the simulated framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11613518/v1
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Mathematical Framework for Dynamic Downside-Minimizing Portfolio with Exotic Option Overlay

Antarik Bansal
Research Square
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
preprint

Mathematical Framework for Dynamic Downside-Minimizing Portfolio with Exotic Option Overlay

Antarik Bansal
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract This study develops and evaluates a dynamic downside-minimizing portfolio through five stages. Starting with a 4-asset universe of equity, bonds, gold, and a volatility instrument, the portfolio is expanded to 13 and then 21 assets while incorporating mean-semivariance optimization, Asian arithmetic-average puts, American puts valued with Longstaff–Schwartz Least-Squares Monte Carlo, covered calls, momentum tilts, and regime-aware rebalancing. The final stage targets a 15% expected return. Portfolio performance is evaluated using correlated Geometric Brownian Motion with 20,000 Monte Carlo paths over a one-year horizon. The four-asset semivariance-optimized portfolio has a Sortino ratio of 2.04 and a maximum simulated loss of −23.7%, compared with 1.20 and −45.9% for SPY. Adding Asian and American puts increases the Sortino ratio to 2.26 and reduces maximum simulated loss to −8.8%. The 13-asset buy-and-hold portfolio reaches a mean Sortino ratio of 5.81. Among the rebalancing strategies tested, calendar rebalancing produced the highest mean Sortino ratio of 9.62. The 21-asset portfolio with a 15% return target has a Sortino ratio of 4.06 and maximum simulated loss of −28.8%; the full option overlay reduces the latter to −9.1%. These results characterize the tradeoffs among diversification, downside protection, return targets, and adaptive rebalancing within the simulated framework.

Research Square
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon