Artificial Intelligence in Architectural Design: Scientometric Mapping and a Futures Typology

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in architectural design through generation, prediction, simulation, optimization, and data-driven decision support. Yet research on AI in architectural design (AI-in-AD) remains dispersed across architectural computation, building-performance optimization, construction automation, energy research, and wider AI domains. This study provides an AD-delimited scientometric analysis of 2541 Scopus-indexed publications spanning 1974–2026, retrieved on 5 September 2026; coverage of 2026 is partial. Publication trends, keyword co-occurrence, document co-citation, citation-burst detection, direct citation among publication sources, and institutional and country/region co-authorship networks were used to characterize the field’s historical, thematic, intellectual, publication-source, and collaborative structures. The results show rapid expansion after 2021 and identify three interconnected thematic domains: AI-enabled generative and representational design workflows, performance-driven optimization, and machine-learning-based sustainability and intelligent-building research. Co-citation and citation-burst patterns indicate a succession from early space-planning, expert-system, and evolutionary approaches through building-performance optimization to recent deep learning and generative AI applications. Publication and collaboration structures span multiple disciplinary outlets, while research output and collaboration patterns are unevenly distributed across institutions and countries/regions. Building on these findings, this study develops a conceptual futures typology comprising sixteen configurations defined by four identified conditions: direction, pace, purpose, and distribution. The typology distinguishes alternative futures relative to the field’s current trajectory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Architecture
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6040204
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Artificial Intelligence in Architectural Design: Scientometric Mapping and a Futures Typology

SeyedAli DERAZGISOU, Saman Mohsenirad, James Jones
Architecture
Architecture and Computational Design
article

Artificial Intelligence in Architectural Design: Scientometric Mapping and a Futures Typology

SeyedAli DERAZGISOU, Saman Mohsenirad, James Jones
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in architectural design through generation, prediction, simulation, optimization, and data-driven decision support. Yet research on AI in architectural design (AI-in-AD) remains dispersed across architectural computation, building-performance optimization, construction automation, energy research, and wider AI domains. This study provides an AD-delimited scientometric analysis of 2541 Scopus-indexed publications spanning 1974–2026, retrieved on 5 September 2026; coverage of 2026 is partial. Publication trends, keyword co-occurrence, document co-citation, citation-burst detection, direct citation among publication sources, and institutional and country/region co-authorship networks were used to characterize the field’s historical, thematic, intellectual, publication-source, and collaborative structures. The results show rapid expansion after 2021 and identify three interconnected thematic domains: AI-enabled generative and representational design workflows, performance-driven optimization, and machine-learning-based sustainability and intelligent-building research. Co-citation and citation-burst patterns indicate a succession from early space-planning, expert-system, and evolutionary approaches through building-performance optimization to recent deep learning and generative AI applications. Publication and collaboration structures span multiple disciplinary outlets, while research output and collaboration patterns are unevenly distributed across institutions and countries/regions. Building on these findings, this study develops a conceptual futures typology comprising sixteen configurations defined by four identified conditions: direction, pace, purpose, and distribution. The typology distinguishes alternative futures relative to the field’s current trajectory.

ArchitectureVol. 6(4)
Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Architecture and Computational Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon