Construction of Optimization Models and Empirical Testing for Multi-Asset Allocation in Quantitative Portfolio Management

Traditional multi-asset portfolios generally assume that historical correlations and diversification relationships are stable enough to be relied upon in optimization. That assumption fails during market stress, precisely when diversification matters most: correlations rise, historical hedges stop hedging, and static optimizers misallocate risk. This study develops and empirically evaluates a portfolio optimization framework that explicitly models changing cross-asset dependencies while accounting for the estimation uncertainty, liquidity heterogeneity, and trading costs that accompany implementation. Three practical problems motivate the design—correlations are estimated imperfectly, market regimes change, and trading is costly—and each is met by a corresponding safeguard: distributionally robust covariance estimation, regime-aware rebalancing triggers, and turnover regularization. The framework is tested on a balanced panel of 127 assets spanning equities, fixed income, commodities, and alternative risk premia over 365 weekly observations (2017–2023), with rolling out-of-sample evaluation across low-volatility, stress-transition, and high-inflation regimes, and is benchmarked against Global Minimum Variance (GMV) and equal-weight (EW) portfolios. Relative to those benchmarks, the framework reduces maximum drawdown depth during the 2020 Q1 and 2022 H2 stress episodes (12.3% versus 24.7% and 28.9%), lowers the tail risk ratio (1.82 versus 2.94 and 3.17), preserves a higher Effective Number of Bets (8.4 versus 4.1 and 5.9), and does so with lower turnover. Taken together, the results suggest that explicitly modeling time-varying cross-asset dependencies and implementation constraints, rather than optimizing against a static covariance matrix, can materially improve portfolio resilience; the comparison is limited to these two benchmarks and to a single historical sample, and is interpreted accordingly.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Financial economics research.
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70267/fer.v3n6.4256
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Construction of Optimization Models and Empirical Testing for Multi-Asset Allocation in Quantitative Portfolio Management

Yuting Wu
Financial economics research.
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
article

Construction of Optimization Models and Empirical Testing for Multi-Asset Allocation in Quantitative Portfolio Management

Yuting Wu
article en

Abstract

Traditional multi-asset portfolios generally assume that historical correlations and diversification relationships are stable enough to be relied upon in optimization. That assumption fails during market stress, precisely when diversification matters most: correlations rise, historical hedges stop hedging, and static optimizers misallocate risk. This study develops and empirically evaluates a portfolio optimization framework that explicitly models changing cross-asset dependencies while accounting for the estimation uncertainty, liquidity heterogeneity, and trading costs that accompany implementation. Three practical problems motivate the design—correlations are estimated imperfectly, market regimes change, and trading is costly—and each is met by a corresponding safeguard: distributionally robust covariance estimation, regime-aware rebalancing triggers, and turnover regularization. The framework is tested on a balanced panel of 127 assets spanning equities, fixed income, commodities, and alternative risk premia over 365 weekly observations (2017–2023), with rolling out-of-sample evaluation across low-volatility, stress-transition, and high-inflation regimes, and is benchmarked against Global Minimum Variance (GMV) and equal-weight (EW) portfolios. Relative to those benchmarks, the framework reduces maximum drawdown depth during the 2020 Q1 and 2022 H2 stress episodes (12.3% versus 24.7% and 28.9%), lowers the tail risk ratio (1.82 versus 2.94 and 3.17), preserves a higher Effective Number of Bets (8.4 versus 4.1 and 5.9), and does so with lower turnover. Taken together, the results suggest that explicitly modeling time-varying cross-asset dependencies and implementation constraints, rather than optimizing against a static covariance matrix, can materially improve portfolio resilience; the comparison is limited to these two benchmarks and to a single historical sample, and is interpreted accordingly.

Financial economics research.Vol. 3(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Construction of Optimization Models and Empirical Testing for Multi-Asset Allocation in Quantitative Portfolio Management — Yuting Wu · Financial economics research. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS