Dynamic mutator states in cancer

Somatic mutation generation is fundamental to cancer initiation, progression, heterogeneity, and treatment resistance, yet mutagenic capacity is often interpreted primarily through constitutive defects in DNA replication and genome-maintenance pathways. Emerging evidence indicates that the probability, rate, and spectrum of newly acquired mutations can also vary with cellular physiology and environmental context. This Review examines metabolic and mitochondrial alterations, oncogenic replication stress, transcriptional and chromatin-associated processes, inflammatory and enzymatic mutagenesis, tumor-microenvironmental pressures, and therapy-associated adaptation as potential determinants of mutation generation. We distinguish mutation generation from DNA damage, genomic instability, accumulated mutation burden, mutational topography, and clonal selection, and evaluate these mechanisms according to the strength of evidence linking cellular or environmental perturbations to subsequent mutation acquisition. Building on classical mutator phenotypes and prior concepts of stress-induced, adaptive, and therapy-associated mutagenesis, we propose the framework of dynamic mutator states: coordinated cellular configurations in which mutagenic capacity differs from an appropriate reference state through mechanistically identifiable processes and is accompanied by altered acquisition, rate, or spectrum of new mutations. Such states may be transient, recurrent, persistent, or progressively stabilized during tumor initiation, spatial diversification, metastatic evolution, treatment adaptation, residual disease, and relapse. We further define experimental criteria for identifying dynamic mutator states, emphasizing prospective mutation measurement, temporal ordering, lineage resolution, perturbation, and reversal or rescue. Finally, we consider whether mutation-generating processes themselves could become therapeutic targets, thereby limiting the supply of new genetic variation available for subsequent selection. A state-based view of mutagenesis provides a framework for connecting cellular physiology to mutation acquisition and for determining when mutation supply becomes a dynamic and potentially actionable component of cancer evolution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2026.2007761
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Dynamic mutator states in cancer

Moawiah M. Naffaa
Frontiers in Genetics
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Dynamic mutator states in cancer

Moawiah M. Naffaa
article en

Abstract

Somatic mutation generation is fundamental to cancer initiation, progression, heterogeneity, and treatment resistance, yet mutagenic capacity is often interpreted primarily through constitutive defects in DNA replication and genome-maintenance pathways. Emerging evidence indicates that the probability, rate, and spectrum of newly acquired mutations can also vary with cellular physiology and environmental context. This Review examines metabolic and mitochondrial alterations, oncogenic replication stress, transcriptional and chromatin-associated processes, inflammatory and enzymatic mutagenesis, tumor-microenvironmental pressures, and therapy-associated adaptation as potential determinants of mutation generation. We distinguish mutation generation from DNA damage, genomic instability, accumulated mutation burden, mutational topography, and clonal selection, and evaluate these mechanisms according to the strength of evidence linking cellular or environmental perturbations to subsequent mutation acquisition. Building on classical mutator phenotypes and prior concepts of stress-induced, adaptive, and therapy-associated mutagenesis, we propose the framework of dynamic mutator states: coordinated cellular configurations in which mutagenic capacity differs from an appropriate reference state through mechanistically identifiable processes and is accompanied by altered acquisition, rate, or spectrum of new mutations. Such states may be transient, recurrent, persistent, or progressively stabilized during tumor initiation, spatial diversification, metastatic evolution, treatment adaptation, residual disease, and relapse. We further define experimental criteria for identifying dynamic mutator states, emphasizing prospective mutation measurement, temporal ordering, lineage resolution, perturbation, and reversal or rescue. Finally, we consider whether mutation-generating processes themselves could become therapeutic targets, thereby limiting the supply of new genetic variation available for subsequent selection. A state-based view of mutagenesis provides a framework for connecting cellular physiology to mutation acquisition and for determining when mutation supply becomes a dynamic and potentially actionable component of cancer evolution.

Frontiers in GeneticsVol. 17
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon