Model-Based Positive Generation Gaps and Smart EV Charging Potential: A 2020–2025 Case Study of Photovoltaics, Wind Power, and Hydropower

This study compares theoretical annual renewable generation with recorded grid injection from one Polish distribution system operator for 2020–2025. Across 1513 source-year records, the cumulative positive model–injection difference is 3148.304 GWh. Large sources contribute 96.00%, while wind contributes 92.75% under an assumed capacity factor of 0.24. An annual charging calculation uses a hypothetical fleet of 20,043 electric vehicles with a demand of 53.308 GWh/year. Assuming full eligibility of the positive difference and 90% conditional capture, large-source scenarios for 2025 cover 47.34%, 100.00% and 65.67% of demand for photovoltaics, wind and hydropower, respectively. At 10% eligibility, coverage falls to 4.75%, 91.12% and 6.57%. Scaling reference generation by ±20% gives positive differences of 1874.982–4429.287 GWh. In a sensitivity analysis, excluding nine implausible hydropower records reduces root mean square error from 3545.5 to 2078.4 MWh/(MW·year), without changing the positive total. These conditional accounting results identify priorities for data reconciliation and subsequent operational measurements. They do not measure curtailment or demonstrate temporal coincidence, network deliverability, realized charging potential or economic benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19215300
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Model-Based Positive Generation Gaps and Smart EV Charging Potential: A 2020–2025 Case Study of Photovoltaics, Wind Power, and Hydropower

Kamila Ewa Klimek, Adam Koniuszy, Tomasz Kozakowski
Energies
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Model-Based Positive Generation Gaps and Smart EV Charging Potential: A 2020–2025 Case Study of Photovoltaics, Wind Power, and Hydropower

Kamila Ewa Klimek, Adam Koniuszy, Tomasz Kozakowski
article en

Abstract

This study compares theoretical annual renewable generation with recorded grid injection from one Polish distribution system operator for 2020–2025. Across 1513 source-year records, the cumulative positive model–injection difference is 3148.304 GWh. Large sources contribute 96.00%, while wind contributes 92.75% under an assumed capacity factor of 0.24. An annual charging calculation uses a hypothetical fleet of 20,043 electric vehicles with a demand of 53.308 GWh/year. Assuming full eligibility of the positive difference and 90% conditional capture, large-source scenarios for 2025 cover 47.34%, 100.00% and 65.67% of demand for photovoltaics, wind and hydropower, respectively. At 10% eligibility, coverage falls to 4.75%, 91.12% and 6.57%. Scaling reference generation by ±20% gives positive differences of 1874.982–4429.287 GWh. In a sensitivity analysis, excluding nine implausible hydropower records reduces root mean square error from 3545.5 to 2078.4 MWh/(MW·year), without changing the positive total. These conditional accounting results identify priorities for data reconciliation and subsequent operational measurements. They do not measure curtailment or demonstrate temporal coincidence, network deliverability, realized charging potential or economic benefit.

EnergiesVol. 19(21)
West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin (PL), University of Life Sciences in Lublin (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon