The invisible work of editors: Why editorial synthesis deserves a name
A peer reviewer evaluates a manuscript. An editor must do something different: bring the reviews together, weigh competing assessments, consider the journal’s standards, and reach a defensible decision. That essential work has a name: editorial synthesis. In this first Research Report presented through our Dual Dissemination format, Leslie H. Nicoll examines editorial synthesis as Layer 4 of the Journal Systems Framework. The Research Report investigates how structured, AI-assisted synthesis can support editorial judgment across five manuscript cases. The accompanying essay explains why this often-unseen work deserves greater attention in editorial scholarship and education.
Authors
- Leslie H. Nicoll (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2149-7856)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-11-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23705577
- Primary Topic
- Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00