Identifying the Best Interpolation Technique for PM2.5 Concentrations in Delhi

Continuous ambient air quality monitoring stations report PM2.5 at a small number of discrete points, whereas exposure and health-impact studies require concentrations at arbitrary locations. This study identifies the interpolation technique that predicts PM2.5 over Delhi most accurately and, unlike comparisons that adopt software defaults, optimises the governing parameters of every technique before comparing them. Four techniques available in ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst were examined: inverse distance weighting (IDW), spline, kriging and cokriging. For each technique three parameters were varied systematically, and leave-one-out cross-validation across 24 monitoring stations gave the root mean square prediction error for every combination, in a spatial phase (10 dates) and a temporal phase (24 stations). Cokriging gave the lowest mean error in both phases, 26.21 and 26.03 µg/ m3 respectively, improving on IDW by 6.9 and 4.3 per cent; wind speed, temperature and relative humidity were selected as the optimal secondary variables in both phases. The margin over the deterministic techniques narrows sharply in the temporal phase. Prediction surfaces generated with the optimised model reproduce the two annual pollution episodes reported for Delhi.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.68648/ijte-q-2026-49-03-007
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Identifying the Best Interpolation Technique for PM2.5 Concentrations in Delhi

Sumit Suman
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
article

Identifying the Best Interpolation Technique for PM2.5 Concentrations in Delhi

Sumit Suman
article en

Abstract

Continuous ambient air quality monitoring stations report PM2.5 at a small number of discrete points, whereas exposure and health-impact studies require concentrations at arbitrary locations. This study identifies the interpolation technique that predicts PM2.5 over Delhi most accurately and, unlike comparisons that adopt software defaults, optimises the governing parameters of every technique before comparing them. Four techniques available in ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst were examined: inverse distance weighting (IDW), spline, kriging and cokriging. For each technique three parameters were varied systematically, and leave-one-out cross-validation across 24 monitoring stations gave the root mean square prediction error for every combination, in a spatial phase (10 dates) and a temporal phase (24 stations). Cokriging gave the lowest mean error in both phases, 26.21 and 26.03 µg/ m3 respectively, improving on IDW by 6.9 and 4.3 per cent; wind speed, temperature and relative humidity were selected as the optimal secondary variables in both phases. The margin over the deterministic techniques narrows sharply in the temporal phase. Prediction surfaces generated with the optimised model reproduce the two annual pollution episodes reported for Delhi.

Vol. 49(03)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon