Exploring Community‐Based Oral Health Screening and Prevention for Children, With Children, in Non‐Clinical Settings: An Explanatory Parallel Mixed Methods Study

OBJECTIVES: Lack of regular access to dental services for children can increase disease prevalence and burden on NHS services, which is aggravated for the most vulnerable. Non-clinical community hubs could be a feasible alternative for dental checks and oral health education. The aim of this study was to assess the oral health of children attending a non-clinical community hub, and the feasibility/acceptability of these settings to children. METHOD: This study adopted an parallel mixed-methods approach. Dental screening of children (0-16 years old) was undertaken in a non-clinical community hub by a trained and calibrated dentist in April 2024. Basic demographics, global quality of life and clinical data were collected. All children were given oral health education using tooth models and dietary advice. A sub-sample of children were recruited for qualitative inquiry, using a purposive sampling strategy. Three focus groups were facilitated with a pre-determined topic guide and creative arts-based techniques to facilitate discussion. These were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and inductively coded following thematic analysis. RESULTS: MFT was 2.0 (SD 3.1; 0-19). Fifteen patients had silver diamine fluoride, 125 had fluoride varnish and one refused. Forty-one children were signposted for future care. Three focus groups involving 11 children identified three themes that were constructed from the data were: 'space' requirements; promoting positive engagement; familiarity with the environment. Children were generally accepting of foodbanks as settings for oral health screening and preventive care. They emphasised the importance of child-friendly, non-threatening spaces and highlighted how familiar environments and trusted staff fostered feelings of safety and engagement. CONCLUSION: Non-clinical community hubs are feasible and acceptable spaces to children to screen for oral health, providing a unique opportunity to reduce barriers to access and to target underserved groups with following on screening activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.70140
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Exploring Community‐Based Oral Health Screening and Prevention for Children, With Children, in Non‐Clinical Settings: An Explanatory Parallel Mixed Methods Study

Simon James Stone, Luisa Anne Wakeling, Charlotte C. Currie, Nicola Goodship et al.
Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Exploring Community‐Based Oral Health Screening and Prevention for Children, With Children, in Non‐Clinical Settings: An Explanatory Parallel Mixed Methods Study

Simon James Stone, Luisa Anne Wakeling, Charlotte C. Currie, Nicola Goodship, Maria Raisa Jessica Aquino, Emma J. Lim, Oliver Sumner, Greig Taylor, Carole Rowland
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Lack of regular access to dental services for children can increase disease prevalence and burden on NHS services, which is aggravated for the most vulnerable. Non-clinical community hubs could be a feasible alternative for dental checks and oral health education. The aim of this study was to assess the oral health of children attending a non-clinical community hub, and the feasibility/acceptability of these settings to children. METHOD: This study adopted an parallel mixed-methods approach. Dental screening of children (0-16 years old) was undertaken in a non-clinical community hub by a trained and calibrated dentist in April 2024. Basic demographics, global quality of life and clinical data were collected. All children were given oral health education using tooth models and dietary advice. A sub-sample of children were recruited for qualitative inquiry, using a purposive sampling strategy. Three focus groups were facilitated with a pre-determined topic guide and creative arts-based techniques to facilitate discussion. These were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and inductively coded following thematic analysis. RESULTS: MFT was 2.0 (SD 3.1; 0-19). Fifteen patients had silver diamine fluoride, 125 had fluoride varnish and one refused. Forty-one children were signposted for future care. Three focus groups involving 11 children identified three themes that were constructed from the data were: 'space' requirements; promoting positive engagement; familiarity with the environment. Children were generally accepting of foodbanks as settings for oral health screening and preventive care. They emphasised the importance of child-friendly, non-threatening spaces and highlighted how familiar environments and trusted staff fostered feelings of safety and engagement. CONCLUSION: Non-clinical community hubs are feasible and acceptable spaces to children to screen for oral health, providing a unique opportunity to reduce barriers to access and to target underserved groups with following on screening activities.

Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology
Newcastle Dental Hospital (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon