Predatory publishing - what medical communicators need to know: An update 7 years on

Predatory journals publish manuscripts for a fee while bypassing peer review and disregarding publication ethics. The number of predatory journals has grown from some 8000 (2014) to over 20,000 (2026). The targeting of potential authors is intentional: predatory publishers focus disproportionately on early-career researchers and those in low- and middle-income countries, though high submission volumes from wealthy institutions sustain their market. Awareness remains poor as most researchers cannot reliably identify a journal as predatory. However, although at a low level, academic interest in predatory publishing has nearly doubled between 2021 and 2025. As articles in predatory journals increasingly enter systematic reviews and regulatory dossiers, medical communicators must critically appraise and verify not only the article they use, but also the journal that published it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Writing
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56012/jzsf6276
Primary Topic
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Predatory publishing - what medical communicators need to know: An update 7 years on

Thomas M. Schindler, Andrea Bucceri
Medical Writing
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
article

Predatory publishing - what medical communicators need to know: An update 7 years on

Thomas M. Schindler, Andrea Bucceri
article en

Abstract

Predatory journals publish manuscripts for a fee while bypassing peer review and disregarding publication ethics. The number of predatory journals has grown from some 8000 (2014) to over 20,000 (2026). The targeting of potential authors is intentional: predatory publishers focus disproportionately on early-career researchers and those in low- and middle-income countries, though high submission volumes from wealthy institutions sustain their market. Awareness remains poor as most researchers cannot reliably identify a journal as predatory. However, although at a low level, academic interest in predatory publishing has nearly doubled between 2021 and 2025. As articles in predatory journals increasingly enter systematic reviews and regulatory dossiers, medical communicators must critically appraise and verify not only the article they use, but also the journal that published it.

Medical WritingVol. 35(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon