Resilience, coping strategies and psychological well-being across academic years in nursing students: a multicentre cross-sectional study

Nursing students face high academic and clinical demands, and the COVID-19 pandemic created an exceptional context in which coping and psychological well-being may have been altered. This study examined psychological well-being and its cross-sectional associations with resilience, different kinds of coping strategies and academic year in undergraduate nursing students during the 2021–2022 academic year. A multicentre cross-sectional analytical study was reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines. Participants: Undergraduate nursing students enrolled at three Spanish public universities completed an anonymous online questionnaire. The questionnaire included sociodemographic and academic variables, the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale, the Coping with Stress Questionnaire and the Ryff Psychological Well-being Scale. Convenience sampling was used; therefore, inference is limited to the participating cohorts and should not be interpreted as representative of all Spanish nursing students. The analytic sample comprised 682 students. Psychological well-being was positively associated with resilience and problem-focused coping (Seeking Social Support and Positive Reappraisal) and negatively associated with emotion-focused coping (Negative Self-Talk). In the hierarchical model, resilience accounted for 26.7% of the variance; adding coping specific strategies increased explained variance to 46.5%. Adding academic year as an ordinal term produced a small additional contribution (ΔR² =0.008; final R²=0.475, p = .002). In the categorical sensitivity model, the academic-year block added ΔR² = 0.009 (F change(3, 671) = 3.79, p = .010), with fourth year lower than first year (B = − 6.31, 95% CI − 10.05 to − 2.58, p = .001). After additional adjustment for age, sex/gender, university and academic record, the year-specific coefficients were no longer statistically significant; resilience and the coping dimensions remained associated with well-being, and University 2 versus University 1 was also independently associated with lower well-being (B = − 5.02, p = .003). Resilience and problem-focused coping, in particular Seeking Social Support, were positively associated with psychological well-being, whereas emotion-focused coping, specifically Negative Self-Talk, was negatively associated. Academic year contributed only a minimal increment to explained variance, and the year-specific associations were no longer statistically significant after adjustment for a broader set of covariates. The cross-sectional convenience design precludes causal inference and limits generalisability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-05620-w
Primary Topic
Student Stress and Coping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Resilience, coping strategies and psychological well-being across academic years in nursing students: a multicentre cross-sectional study

José Rafael González‐López, Marta Nieto, Raquel Bartolomé Gutiérrez, Ana Rosa Alconero‐Camarero et al.
BMC Nursing
Student Stress and Coping
article

Resilience, coping strategies and psychological well-being across academic years in nursing students: a multicentre cross-sectional study

José Rafael González‐López, Marta Nieto, Raquel Bartolomé Gutiérrez, Ana Rosa Alconero‐Camarero, Carmen Sarabia‐Cobo, María Eugenia Visier‐Alfonso, Ana Isabel Cobo‐Cuenca, R López García
article en

Abstract

Nursing students face high academic and clinical demands, and the COVID-19 pandemic created an exceptional context in which coping and psychological well-being may have been altered. This study examined psychological well-being and its cross-sectional associations with resilience, different kinds of coping strategies and academic year in undergraduate nursing students during the 2021–2022 academic year. A multicentre cross-sectional analytical study was reported in accordance with the STROBE guidelines. Participants: Undergraduate nursing students enrolled at three Spanish public universities completed an anonymous online questionnaire. The questionnaire included sociodemographic and academic variables, the 10-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale, the Coping with Stress Questionnaire and the Ryff Psychological Well-being Scale. Convenience sampling was used; therefore, inference is limited to the participating cohorts and should not be interpreted as representative of all Spanish nursing students. The analytic sample comprised 682 students. Psychological well-being was positively associated with resilience and problem-focused coping (Seeking Social Support and Positive Reappraisal) and negatively associated with emotion-focused coping (Negative Self-Talk). In the hierarchical model, resilience accounted for 26.7% of the variance; adding coping specific strategies increased explained variance to 46.5%. Adding academic year as an ordinal term produced a small additional contribution (ΔR² =0.008; final R²=0.475, p = .002). In the categorical sensitivity model, the academic-year block added ΔR² = 0.009 (F change(3, 671) = 3.79, p = .010), with fourth year lower than first year (B = − 6.31, 95% CI − 10.05 to − 2.58, p = .001). After additional adjustment for age, sex/gender, university and academic record, the year-specific coefficients were no longer statistically significant; resilience and the coping dimensions remained associated with well-being, and University 2 versus University 1 was also independently associated with lower well-being (B = − 5.02, p = .003). Resilience and problem-focused coping, in particular Seeking Social Support, were positively associated with psychological well-being, whereas emotion-focused coping, specifically Negative Self-Talk, was negatively associated. Academic year contributed only a minimal increment to explained variance, and the year-specific associations were no longer statistically significant after adjustment for a broader set of covariates. The cross-sectional convenience design precludes causal inference and limits generalisability.

BMC Nursing
Universidad de Cantabria (ES), Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (ES), Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Student Stress and Coping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon