Post‐traumatic headache: A two‐arm parallel‐group, randomized, single‐blind, sham‐controlled clinical superiority trial evaluating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a novel treatment modality

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on persistent post-traumatic headache (pPTH) in adults with pPTH and a high burden of persistent post-concussion symptoms (pPCS) 4-5 months after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). BACKGROUND: pPTH is a disabling sequela of mTBI with no established effective treatment. rTMS is a promising treatment modality. METHODS: This two-arm parallel-group, randomized (1:1), single-blind, sham-controlled, clinical superiority trial was conducted at Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Hammel, Denmark from August 2023 to August 2024. Participants were randomized to receive five sessions of either active high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS; 2000 pulses, 10 Hz) or sham stimulation targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) 4-5 months post-trauma. The primary outcome was the monthly mean difference in change in headache days of moderate-to-severe intensity between the active treatment group and the sham group. This was assessed using daily headache diaries before and after intervention. Secondary outcomes included measures of pPCS burden and headache impact, and pain catastrophizing at 1- and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 62 participants were randomized (rTMS, n = 30; sham, n = 32). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 62), the adjusted monthly mean difference in change (i.e., the treatment effect) between the active treatment group and the sham group was -1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [-3.10; -0.01], p = 0.049) headache days. The treatment effect in a sensitivity analysis of the modified ITT population (n = 61) was -1.08 (95% CI: [-2.60; 0.45]), p = 0.166) headache days. No significant adjusted mean difference in change was observed for any secondary outcome between the active rTMS group and the sham group from baseline to 1 month end of treatment (EOT): it was -0.58 (95% CI: [-1.23; 0.08], p = 0.084) for headache intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale; 0.14 days (95% CI: [-1.01; 1.29], p = 0.816) for acute medication use; -4.07 (95% CI: [-8.81; 0.69], p = 0.093) for total Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire score; -1.08 (95% CI: [-4.80; 2.64], p = 0.567) for Headache Impact Test score; -1.36 (95% CI: [-2.91; 0.19], p = 0.085) for Symptom Checklist-6 subscale depression score; 1.74 (95% CI: [-5.22; 1.73], p = 0.324) for Pain Catastrophizing Scale score. The primary outcome and all secondary outcomes, except acute medication use, showed significant reductions over time in both groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: High-frequency rTMS targeting the left DLPFC was associated with a statistically significant reduction in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days compared with sham in adults with pPTH 4-5 months post-trauma; however, the sensitivity analysis did not support the findings. Both groups demonstrated symptom reduction over time, likely reflecting spontaneous recovery and non-specific treatment effects. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to further evaluate the role of rTMC in pPTH, including alternative stimulation targets and treatment protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/head.70263
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Post‐traumatic headache: A two‐arm parallel‐group, randomized, single‐blind, sham‐controlled clinical superiority trial evaluating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a novel treatment modality

Lene Odgaard, Henriette Holm Stabel, Line Amalie Aarestrup Hellemose, Anne‐Sofie Greve et al.
Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Post‐traumatic headache: A two‐arm parallel‐group, randomized, single‐blind, sham‐controlled clinical superiority trial evaluating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a novel treatment modality

Lene Odgaard, Henriette Holm Stabel, Line Amalie Aarestrup Hellemose, Anne‐Sofie Greve, Simple Futarmal Kothari, Toril Skandsen, Henrik Winther Schytz, Camilla Biering Lundquist, Charlotte Nygaard, J. Zeiler Nielsen, Amalie Bilgaard Nicolaisen, Mille M. Thastum, Sedsel K. S. Pedersen, Carsten B. Pedersen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on persistent post-traumatic headache (pPTH) in adults with pPTH and a high burden of persistent post-concussion symptoms (pPCS) 4-5 months after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). BACKGROUND: pPTH is a disabling sequela of mTBI with no established effective treatment. rTMS is a promising treatment modality. METHODS: This two-arm parallel-group, randomized (1:1), single-blind, sham-controlled, clinical superiority trial was conducted at Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Hammel, Denmark from August 2023 to August 2024. Participants were randomized to receive five sessions of either active high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS; 2000 pulses, 10 Hz) or sham stimulation targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) 4-5 months post-trauma. The primary outcome was the monthly mean difference in change in headache days of moderate-to-severe intensity between the active treatment group and the sham group. This was assessed using daily headache diaries before and after intervention. Secondary outcomes included measures of pPCS burden and headache impact, and pain catastrophizing at 1- and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 62 participants were randomized (rTMS, n = 30; sham, n = 32). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 62), the adjusted monthly mean difference in change (i.e., the treatment effect) between the active treatment group and the sham group was -1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [-3.10; -0.01], p = 0.049) headache days. The treatment effect in a sensitivity analysis of the modified ITT population (n = 61) was -1.08 (95% CI: [-2.60; 0.45]), p = 0.166) headache days. No significant adjusted mean difference in change was observed for any secondary outcome between the active rTMS group and the sham group from baseline to 1 month end of treatment (EOT): it was -0.58 (95% CI: [-1.23; 0.08], p = 0.084) for headache intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale; 0.14 days (95% CI: [-1.01; 1.29], p = 0.816) for acute medication use; -4.07 (95% CI: [-8.81; 0.69], p = 0.093) for total Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire score; -1.08 (95% CI: [-4.80; 2.64], p = 0.567) for Headache Impact Test score; -1.36 (95% CI: [-2.91; 0.19], p = 0.085) for Symptom Checklist-6 subscale depression score; 1.74 (95% CI: [-5.22; 1.73], p = 0.324) for Pain Catastrophizing Scale score. The primary outcome and all secondary outcomes, except acute medication use, showed significant reductions over time in both groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: High-frequency rTMS targeting the left DLPFC was associated with a statistically significant reduction in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days compared with sham in adults with pPTH 4-5 months post-trauma; however, the sensitivity analysis did not support the findings. Both groups demonstrated symptom reduction over time, likely reflecting spontaneous recovery and non-specific treatment effects. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to further evaluate the role of rTMC in pPTH, including alternative stimulation targets and treatment protocols.

Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
University of Copenhagen (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), St Olav's University Hospital (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon