Designing a source‐grounded Socratic anatomy coach using artificial intelligence to support anatomical reasoning during clinical clerkships

Anatomical knowledge must remain retrievable and clinically usable during clerkships, yet previously learned anatomy is often least accessible when students need it most. Generative AI is increasingly available at the point of need, but unstructured use risks displacing the cognitive work required for durable learning. The educational problem is therefore not whether AI can answer anatomy questions, but how a chatbot can be designed so that it supports learning without replacing anatomical reasoning. In this discursive article, we present the design of a source-grounded Anatomy-AI Coach for medical students during clinical clerkships at Radboudumc. The current proof-of-principle covers musculoskeletal and neuroanatomical questions and is intended for preparatory, just-in-time, and reflective use around patient encounters. The design is organized around a five-phase interaction protocol: goal clarification, concise answer with source citation and micro-action, multimodal bridge, Socratic coaching with a mirror step, and reflective closure. The protocol draws on self-regulated learning, the ICAP framework, and emerging work on cognitive offloading and AI as a cognitive mirror. We describe guardrails, scope restriction, source grounding, uncertainty communication, clinical boundaries, and privacy as didactic design features rather than purely technical constraints. This article is part of a larger design-based research project; future phases will evaluate factual accuracy, pedagogical uptake, and effects on anatomical reasoning during clerkships. The present contribution offers a design blueprint rather than outcome data, specifying how the interactional architecture of an anatomy chatbot can be aligned with workplace learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anatomical Sciences Education
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70393
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Designing a source‐grounded Socratic anatomy coach using artificial intelligence to support anatomical reasoning during clinical clerkships

Marc A.T.M. Vorstenbosch, B. M. C. Gorissen, Maarten G. A. van den Bosch, Harmen Thijs de Vries
Anatomical Sciences Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Designing a source‐grounded Socratic anatomy coach using artificial intelligence to support anatomical reasoning during clinical clerkships

Marc A.T.M. Vorstenbosch, B. M. C. Gorissen, Maarten G. A. van den Bosch, Harmen Thijs de Vries
article en

Abstract

Anatomical knowledge must remain retrievable and clinically usable during clerkships, yet previously learned anatomy is often least accessible when students need it most. Generative AI is increasingly available at the point of need, but unstructured use risks displacing the cognitive work required for durable learning. The educational problem is therefore not whether AI can answer anatomy questions, but how a chatbot can be designed so that it supports learning without replacing anatomical reasoning. In this discursive article, we present the design of a source-grounded Anatomy-AI Coach for medical students during clinical clerkships at Radboudumc. The current proof-of-principle covers musculoskeletal and neuroanatomical questions and is intended for preparatory, just-in-time, and reflective use around patient encounters. The design is organized around a five-phase interaction protocol: goal clarification, concise answer with source citation and micro-action, multimodal bridge, Socratic coaching with a mirror step, and reflective closure. The protocol draws on self-regulated learning, the ICAP framework, and emerging work on cognitive offloading and AI as a cognitive mirror. We describe guardrails, scope restriction, source grounding, uncertainty communication, clinical boundaries, and privacy as didactic design features rather than purely technical constraints. This article is part of a larger design-based research project; future phases will evaluate factual accuracy, pedagogical uptake, and effects on anatomical reasoning during clerkships. The present contribution offers a design blueprint rather than outcome data, specifying how the interactional architecture of an anatomy chatbot can be aligned with workplace learning.

Anatomical Sciences Education
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon