Spatiotemporal environmental impact assessment of soil erosion using RUSLE, GIS, and remote sensing

This study evaluates soil erosion in the Kabul River Basin (KRB), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan, using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) integrated with geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing (RS) techniques. We analyzed two benchmark years, 1994 and 2024, to quantify net multi-decadal changes in soil-loss magnitude, erosion severity, and spatial erosion patterns. Rainfall erosivity (R), soil erodibility (K), slope length and steepness (LS), cover management (C), and support practice (P) factors were integrated within a harmonized spatial framework, while Landsat-derived land use and land cover (LULC) maps represented temporal changes in surface conditions. Forest cover increased from 4892.76 to 6751.36 km2, whereas barren land decreased from 18,284.99 to 14,316.69 km2. Mean modelled soil loss declined from 4.70 t ha−1 yr−1 in 1994 to 3.04 t ha−1 yr−1 in 2024, while the maximum localized soil-loss rate decreased from approximately 5003 to 3912 t ha−1 yr−1. Barren land consistently exhibited the highest mean soil loss, decreasing from 14.44 to 11.24 t ha−1 yr−1, whereas forest remained comparatively low at 1.52 and 1.38 t ha−1 yr−1. Spatial soil-loss change ranged from −3184 to +2518 t ha−1 yr−1, with localized increases concentrated mainly in steep and runoff-convergent areas. Overall, the endpoint comparison indicates generally lower erosion conditions in 2024, while persistent mountainous hotspots remain priorities for targeted soil-conservation measures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34925895
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Spatiotemporal environmental impact assessment of soil erosion using RUSLE, GIS, and remote sensing

Zainab Tahir, Muhammad Haseeb, Syed Amer Mahmood, Aqil Tariq et al.
Figshare
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

Spatiotemporal environmental impact assessment of soil erosion using RUSLE, GIS, and remote sensing

Zainab Tahir, Muhammad Haseeb, Syed Amer Mahmood, Aqil Tariq, Qaisar Abbas, Sajid Ullah, M. Abdullah Al-Wadud, Yuxin Li
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates soil erosion in the Kabul River Basin (KRB), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan, using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) integrated with geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing (RS) techniques. We analyzed two benchmark years, 1994 and 2024, to quantify net multi-decadal changes in soil-loss magnitude, erosion severity, and spatial erosion patterns. Rainfall erosivity (R), soil erodibility (K), slope length and steepness (LS), cover management (C), and support practice (P) factors were integrated within a harmonized spatial framework, while Landsat-derived land use and land cover (LULC) maps represented temporal changes in surface conditions. Forest cover increased from 4892.76 to 6751.36 km2, whereas barren land decreased from 18,284.99 to 14,316.69 km2. Mean modelled soil loss declined from 4.70 t ha−1 yr−1 in 1994 to 3.04 t ha−1 yr−1 in 2024, while the maximum localized soil-loss rate decreased from approximately 5003 to 3912 t ha−1 yr−1. Barren land consistently exhibited the highest mean soil loss, decreasing from 14.44 to 11.24 t ha−1 yr−1, whereas forest remained comparatively low at 1.52 and 1.38 t ha−1 yr−1. Spatial soil-loss change ranged from −3184 to +2518 t ha−1 yr−1, with localized increases concentrated mainly in steep and runoff-convergent areas. Overall, the endpoint comparison indicates generally lower erosion conditions in 2024, while persistent mountainous hotspots remain priorities for targeted soil-conservation measures.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon