Disempowered but not disengaged

Abstract Political extremism and polarisation are self-evidently detrimental to democracy in a general sense, but little is known about the effects of these forces at the micro level, such as their potential to reduce how engaged new and would-be citizens are in politics. We address this knowledge gap by focusing on the experience of Korean migrants in Australia, a notionally multicultural and inclusive democracy where nearly one-third of the population is overseas-born, at a time of heightened political polarisation and social discord. In the first half of the 2020s, we argue, migrants themselves became inadvertently embroiled in a host of contentious issues in Australia, such as responses to the Covid-19 pandemic, trust in electoral processes and public institutions, mis-/dis-information, and social cohesion. To explore the degree to which Korean Australians engaged in politics in these conditions of polarisation, this article analyses original data collected from a study of political engagement among Koreans in Australia, as well as reports in the local Korean-language media. The article finds that rather than Korean Australians being disengaged from politics, they are disempowered : they lack the capacity to engage with it as extensively as they would prefer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INContext Studies in Translation and Interculturalism
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ic.26001.hun
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Disempowered but not disengaged

David Hundt, Soyeon Kim
INContext Studies in Translation and Interculturalism
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Disempowered but not disengaged

David Hundt, Soyeon Kim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Political extremism and polarisation are self-evidently detrimental to democracy in a general sense, but little is known about the effects of these forces at the micro level, such as their potential to reduce how engaged new and would-be citizens are in politics. We address this knowledge gap by focusing on the experience of Korean migrants in Australia, a notionally multicultural and inclusive democracy where nearly one-third of the population is overseas-born, at a time of heightened political polarisation and social discord. In the first half of the 2020s, we argue, migrants themselves became inadvertently embroiled in a host of contentious issues in Australia, such as responses to the Covid-19 pandemic, trust in electoral processes and public institutions, mis-/dis-information, and social cohesion. To explore the degree to which Korean Australians engaged in politics in these conditions of polarisation, this article analyses original data collected from a study of political engagement among Koreans in Australia, as well as reports in the local Korean-language media. The article finds that rather than Korean Australians being disengaged from politics, they are disempowered : they lack the capacity to engage with it as extensively as they would prefer.

INContext Studies in Translation and Interculturalism
Deakin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon