Exploring internalized stigma among people living with psychosis and their caregivers: Insights from a community rehabilitation initiative in Malawi

People living with psychosis (PWLE) experience, anticipate, and internalize stigma. Over time, experienced and anticipated stigma can increase internalized stigma, negatively impacting health. However, predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma among PWLE and their caregivers remain unknown. We explore how stigma changes over time; the associations between hypothesized predictors and internalized stigma; and how internalized stigma influences mental health and functional outcomes. We analyzed data from a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial comparing a community-based rehabilitation intervention to enhanced usual care in Blantyre, Malawi (NCT06080477). Sixty PWLE and 118 caregivers who met eligibility criteria completed interviewer-administered surveys at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) assessed the dimensionality of stigma scales. We used correlations and adjusted generalized estimating equations to examine associations between predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma. EFA supported single-factor structures with adequate internal consistency for most stigma scales. Among PWLE, mean internalized stigma, anticipated stigma, and experienced stigma decreased from baseline to 12 months in both arms. Stigma measures were generally comparable between arms except for family-enacted stigma, which was lower at 12 months among those receiving the intervention compared to usual care (mean difference = -0.97; -1.88, -0.05). At baseline, higher family-enacted stigma was moderately associated with higher internalized stigma scores (correlation coefficient = 0.34; 0.13, 0.53). Greater change in family-enacted stigma (regression coefficient = 0.24; 0.04, 0.43) and anticipated stigma (0.14; 0.02, 0.26) were weakly associated with greater change in internalized stigma. At baseline, internalized stigma was weakly associated with depressive (0.14; -0.08, 0.35) and anxiety symptoms (0.11; -0.08, 0.31). Over time, greater increases in internalized stigma were associated with higher anxiety (0.13; 0.01, 0.24). Caregivers’ internalized stigma decreased over 12 months, with no associated predictors. Anticipated, experienced, and internalized stigma are prevalent among PWLE in Malawi. Findings suggest the need to continue to explore the mechanisms between predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS mental health.
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000753
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Exploring internalized stigma among people living with psychosis and their caregivers: Insights from a community rehabilitation initiative in Malawi

Kazione Kulisewa, Melissa Ann Stockton, Brian Wells Pence, Mia Buono et al.
PLOS mental health.
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Exploring internalized stigma among people living with psychosis and their caregivers: Insights from a community rehabilitation initiative in Malawi

Kazione Kulisewa, Melissa Ann Stockton, Brian Wells Pence, Mia Buono, Abigail M. Morrison, Bradley Neil Gaynes, Joshua Chienda
article en

Abstract

People living with psychosis (PWLE) experience, anticipate, and internalize stigma. Over time, experienced and anticipated stigma can increase internalized stigma, negatively impacting health. However, predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma among PWLE and their caregivers remain unknown. We explore how stigma changes over time; the associations between hypothesized predictors and internalized stigma; and how internalized stigma influences mental health and functional outcomes. We analyzed data from a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial comparing a community-based rehabilitation intervention to enhanced usual care in Blantyre, Malawi (NCT06080477). Sixty PWLE and 118 caregivers who met eligibility criteria completed interviewer-administered surveys at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) assessed the dimensionality of stigma scales. We used correlations and adjusted generalized estimating equations to examine associations between predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma. EFA supported single-factor structures with adequate internal consistency for most stigma scales. Among PWLE, mean internalized stigma, anticipated stigma, and experienced stigma decreased from baseline to 12 months in both arms. Stigma measures were generally comparable between arms except for family-enacted stigma, which was lower at 12 months among those receiving the intervention compared to usual care (mean difference = -0.97; -1.88, -0.05). At baseline, higher family-enacted stigma was moderately associated with higher internalized stigma scores (correlation coefficient = 0.34; 0.13, 0.53). Greater change in family-enacted stigma (regression coefficient = 0.24; 0.04, 0.43) and anticipated stigma (0.14; 0.02, 0.26) were weakly associated with greater change in internalized stigma. At baseline, internalized stigma was weakly associated with depressive (0.14; -0.08, 0.35) and anxiety symptoms (0.11; -0.08, 0.31). Over time, greater increases in internalized stigma were associated with higher anxiety (0.13; 0.01, 0.24). Caregivers’ internalized stigma decreased over 12 months, with no associated predictors. Anticipated, experienced, and internalized stigma are prevalent among PWLE in Malawi. Findings suggest the need to continue to explore the mechanisms between predictors and outcomes of internalized stigma.

PLOS mental health.Vol. 3(11)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (MW), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon