Development and Validation of the Dishonesty in Intimate Relationships Scale (DIRS)

Abstract: Dishonesty occurs in romantic relationships and can undermine relational functioning. Existing measures typically focus on specific behaviors separately – such as infidelity or lying – rather than capturing dishonesty in romantic relationships more broadly. Addressing this gap, based on three studies with over 3,300 participants overall, we introduce the Dishonesty in Intimate Relationships Scale (DIRS). DIRS is a 10-item measure grounded in a comprehensive framework of dishonesty in romantic relationships, consisting of two dimensions: Deception (e.g., lying, withholding information) and Infidelity (e.g., emotional and sexual unfaithfulness). Study 1 ( N = 1,448) used exploratory factor analysis to identify the two-factor structure. Study 2 ( N = 1,000) supported the structure with confirmatory factor analysis. Study 3 aimed to substantiate the reliability and validity of the DIRS across two measurement occasions ( N = 965 at first, N = 898 at second measurement occasion), including considering its factorial, convergent, discriminant, criterion, and incremental validity. Next to partial support for DIRS’ discriminant validity, results provided support for its convergent and criterion validity, including associations with relationship outcomes (e.g., ambivalence, authenticity, closeness, trust), beyond other dishonesty measures and basic personality dimensions. In sum, DIRS offers a brief, reliable domain-specific tool for assessing dishonesty in romantic relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000970
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Development and Validation of the Dishonesty in Intimate Relationships Scale (DIRS)

Lau Lilleholt, Séamus A. Power, Ingo Zettler, Rachele Mazzini et al.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Development and Validation of the Dishonesty in Intimate Relationships Scale (DIRS)

Lau Lilleholt, Séamus A. Power, Ingo Zettler, Rachele Mazzini, Anna Louise Malfilâtre
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Dishonesty occurs in romantic relationships and can undermine relational functioning. Existing measures typically focus on specific behaviors separately – such as infidelity or lying – rather than capturing dishonesty in romantic relationships more broadly. Addressing this gap, based on three studies with over 3,300 participants overall, we introduce the Dishonesty in Intimate Relationships Scale (DIRS). DIRS is a 10-item measure grounded in a comprehensive framework of dishonesty in romantic relationships, consisting of two dimensions: Deception (e.g., lying, withholding information) and Infidelity (e.g., emotional and sexual unfaithfulness). Study 1 ( N = 1,448) used exploratory factor analysis to identify the two-factor structure. Study 2 ( N = 1,000) supported the structure with confirmatory factor analysis. Study 3 aimed to substantiate the reliability and validity of the DIRS across two measurement occasions ( N = 965 at first, N = 898 at second measurement occasion), including considering its factorial, convergent, discriminant, criterion, and incremental validity. Next to partial support for DIRS’ discriminant validity, results provided support for its convergent and criterion validity, including associations with relationship outcomes (e.g., ambivalence, authenticity, closeness, trust), beyond other dishonesty measures and basic personality dimensions. In sum, DIRS offers a brief, reliable domain-specific tool for assessing dishonesty in romantic relationships.

European Journal of Psychological Assessment
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon