Age-specific pediatric templates improve EEG source-reconstructed biomarkers in children

EEG source reconstruction requires an anatomical head model, ideally constructed from individual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. In developmental studies of children and adolescents, however, MRIs are rarely available. Researchers therefore routinely rely on adult templates, such as the FreeSurfer average (fsaverage), despite substantial anatomical changes throughout development. How much this reliance on adult models biases downstream EEG biomarkers remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether age-specific pediatric templates offer a better alternative to fsaverage for EEG-derived biomarkers in children and adolescents, using individual MRI-based reconstruction as the reference. We analyzed eyes-closed resting-state EEGs from 384 Healthy Brain Network participants aged 5.5 to 17.5 years. For each participant, we tested three anatomical models: their individual MRI, an age-specific pediatric template from a series spanning ages 6-17 at one-year intervals, and the adult fsaverage template. We compared four EEG biomarkers in childhood and adolescence: absolute power, relative power, long-range temporal correlations quantified with detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), and functional excitation-inhibition (fE/I) ratio. Pediatric templates agreed more closely with individual MRI-based biomarkers in both developmental groups and had fewer parcels with significantly different biomarker values than the adult template, except for absolute power in older adolescents. We conclude that when individual MRI is not available, age-specific pediatric templates match individual MRI-based EEG biomarker values more closely than the adult template across all four biomarkers up to approximately 12 years of age and should be the preferred choice at least up to this age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.04.764182
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Age-specific pediatric templates improve EEG source-reconstructed biomarkers in children

Klaus Linkenkaer‐Hansen, Hilgo Bruining, Marina Diachenko, Huibert D. Mansvelder et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
preprint

Age-specific pediatric templates improve EEG source-reconstructed biomarkers in children

Klaus Linkenkaer‐Hansen, Hilgo Bruining, Marina Diachenko, Huibert D. Mansvelder, Arthur-Ervin Avrămiea, Maria Candellero, Tina Ganjipour, Marit van den Berg
preprint en

Abstract

EEG source reconstruction requires an anatomical head model, ideally constructed from individual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. In developmental studies of children and adolescents, however, MRIs are rarely available. Researchers therefore routinely rely on adult templates, such as the FreeSurfer average (fsaverage), despite substantial anatomical changes throughout development. How much this reliance on adult models biases downstream EEG biomarkers remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether age-specific pediatric templates offer a better alternative to fsaverage for EEG-derived biomarkers in children and adolescents, using individual MRI-based reconstruction as the reference. We analyzed eyes-closed resting-state EEGs from 384 Healthy Brain Network participants aged 5.5 to 17.5 years. For each participant, we tested three anatomical models: their individual MRI, an age-specific pediatric template from a series spanning ages 6-17 at one-year intervals, and the adult fsaverage template. We compared four EEG biomarkers in childhood and adolescence: absolute power, relative power, long-range temporal correlations quantified with detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), and functional excitation-inhibition (fE/I) ratio. Pediatric templates agreed more closely with individual MRI-based biomarkers in both developmental groups and had fewer parcels with significantly different biomarker values than the adult template, except for absolute power in older adolescents. We conclude that when individual MRI is not available, age-specific pediatric templates match individual MRI-based EEG biomarker values more closely than the adult template across all four biomarkers up to approximately 12 years of age and should be the preferred choice at least up to this age.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon