Comparison of the Inclination Changes of the Upper First Molars Following Treatment with Two Types of Hyrax Tooth-Borne Expanders: 3D-Printed and Laboratory-Fabricated

Background: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is widely utilized to correct transverse maxillary deficiency in growing patients, yet traditional tooth-borne appliances frequently induce undesirable dental tipping and anchorage loss. Methods: A two-year non-randomized prospective clinical study evaluated and compared the dentoalveolar changes in the upper first molars following RME using two tooth-borne expanders: a conventional Hyrax expander (CHE; n = 47) and a digitally designed metal-printed tooth-borne expander (DDMPTBE; n = 35). Measurements of jugal width and upper first molar inclinations were performed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images before treatment and after a three-month retention period. Results: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for baseline variables demonstrated that both appliances achieved comparable, statistically significant increases in jugal width. However, significant differences were observed in molar inclination changes: the CHE group experienced a greater increase in buccal inclination (unadjusted mean (Standard deviation–SD) increase of 6.56° for the left molar and 5.96° for the right molar; adjusted mean (Estimated marginal means–EMM) increases of 7.58° for the left molar and 6.14° for the right molar), whereas the DDMPTBE group exhibited less change in buccal inclination (unadjusted mean (SD) increase of 1.43° for the left molar and 0.32° for the right molar; adjusted mean (EMM) increases of 0.08° for the left molar and 0.07° for the right molar). Conclusions: Although both expanders effectively increase the jugal width, the findings demonstrate a significant association between appliance type and molar inclination changes, with the CHE linked to increased buccal tipping of the anchorage molars, whereas the DDMPTBE is associated with smaller inclination changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app162110980
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Comparison of the Inclination Changes of the Upper First Molars Following Treatment with Two Types of Hyrax Tooth-Borne Expanders: 3D-Printed and Laboratory-Fabricated

Mirela Georgieva, Silviya Krasteva, Emanuel Emiliyanov, Anzhelina Krasteva
Applied Sciences
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Comparison of the Inclination Changes of the Upper First Molars Following Treatment with Two Types of Hyrax Tooth-Borne Expanders: 3D-Printed and Laboratory-Fabricated

Mirela Georgieva, Silviya Krasteva, Emanuel Emiliyanov, Anzhelina Krasteva
article en

Abstract

Background: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is widely utilized to correct transverse maxillary deficiency in growing patients, yet traditional tooth-borne appliances frequently induce undesirable dental tipping and anchorage loss. Methods: A two-year non-randomized prospective clinical study evaluated and compared the dentoalveolar changes in the upper first molars following RME using two tooth-borne expanders: a conventional Hyrax expander (CHE; n = 47) and a digitally designed metal-printed tooth-borne expander (DDMPTBE; n = 35). Measurements of jugal width and upper first molar inclinations were performed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images before treatment and after a three-month retention period. Results: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for baseline variables demonstrated that both appliances achieved comparable, statistically significant increases in jugal width. However, significant differences were observed in molar inclination changes: the CHE group experienced a greater increase in buccal inclination (unadjusted mean (Standard deviation–SD) increase of 6.56° for the left molar and 5.96° for the right molar; adjusted mean (Estimated marginal means–EMM) increases of 7.58° for the left molar and 6.14° for the right molar), whereas the DDMPTBE group exhibited less change in buccal inclination (unadjusted mean (SD) increase of 1.43° for the left molar and 0.32° for the right molar; adjusted mean (EMM) increases of 0.08° for the left molar and 0.07° for the right molar). Conclusions: Although both expanders effectively increase the jugal width, the findings demonstrate a significant association between appliance type and molar inclination changes, with the CHE linked to increased buccal tipping of the anchorage molars, whereas the DDMPTBE is associated with smaller inclination changes.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(21)
Medical University Plovdiv (BG), Medical University of Sofia (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon