TriFusion-Karst: A spatially robust and hydrogeologically validated stacked-ensemble model for groundwater potential assessment

Abstract Groundwater potential mapping in semi-arid karst regions is often compromised by spatially optimistic validation, limited assessment of predictive variability, and insufficient independent hydrogeological verification. This study introduces TriFusion-Karst, a stacked-ensemble model using RF and LightGBM as base learners and XGBoost as the meta-learner, embedded within a spatially robust and hydrogeologically validated workflow. Thirteen geo-environmental predictors were extracted at 7,313 groundwater monitoring wells, and GTD observations collected during 2018–2024 were pooled and used exclusively as the regression target. TriFusion-Karst and six alternative standalone and ensemble configurations were evaluated using five-fold spatially blocked cross-validation with leakage-controlled out-of-fold meta-feature generation, followed by 30-m spatial prediction. TriFusion-Karst achieved the best performance (RMSE = 1.47 m, MAE = 0.99 m, R² = 0.930, NSE = 0.926, and r = 0.964). Fold-wise spatial prediction variability was quantified using the pixel-wise standard deviation of five fold-specific predictions as an indicator of model stability rather than total predictive uncertainty. Independent validation using 250 mapped karst springs excluded from model development showed that 91.3% occurred within the High and Very High groundwater-potential classes, which covered 42.6% of the study area (SRI = 2.14; p < 0.001; 1,000 permutations). Relief energy, evapotranspiration, fracture density, drainage density, and lithology were the most influential predictors. The resulting maps provide a reproducible basis for regional screening and preliminary groundwater prioritisation but represent relative groundwater favourability rather than aquifer productivity or sustainable yield.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Earth Sciences
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13161-3
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

TriFusion-Karst: A spatially robust and hydrogeologically validated stacked-ensemble model for groundwater potential assessment

Rui Ferreira, Saeid Pourmorad, Luca António Dimuccio, Mostafa Kabolizade
Environmental Earth Sciences
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
article

TriFusion-Karst: A spatially robust and hydrogeologically validated stacked-ensemble model for groundwater potential assessment

Rui Ferreira, Saeid Pourmorad, Luca António Dimuccio, Mostafa Kabolizade
article en

Abstract

Abstract Groundwater potential mapping in semi-arid karst regions is often compromised by spatially optimistic validation, limited assessment of predictive variability, and insufficient independent hydrogeological verification. This study introduces TriFusion-Karst, a stacked-ensemble model using RF and LightGBM as base learners and XGBoost as the meta-learner, embedded within a spatially robust and hydrogeologically validated workflow. Thirteen geo-environmental predictors were extracted at 7,313 groundwater monitoring wells, and GTD observations collected during 2018–2024 were pooled and used exclusively as the regression target. TriFusion-Karst and six alternative standalone and ensemble configurations were evaluated using five-fold spatially blocked cross-validation with leakage-controlled out-of-fold meta-feature generation, followed by 30-m spatial prediction. TriFusion-Karst achieved the best performance (RMSE = 1.47 m, MAE = 0.99 m, R² = 0.930, NSE = 0.926, and r = 0.964). Fold-wise spatial prediction variability was quantified using the pixel-wise standard deviation of five fold-specific predictions as an indicator of model stability rather than total predictive uncertainty. Independent validation using 250 mapped karst springs excluded from model development showed that 91.3% occurred within the High and Very High groundwater-potential classes, which covered 42.6% of the study area (SRI = 2.14; p < 0.001; 1,000 permutations). Relief energy, evapotranspiration, fracture density, drainage density, and lithology were the most influential predictors. The resulting maps provide a reproducible basis for regional screening and preliminary groundwater prioritisation but represent relative groundwater favourability rather than aquifer productivity or sustainable yield.

Environmental Earth SciencesVol. 85(17)
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz (IR), Centro de Estudos em Geografia e Ordenamento do Territorio (PT), University of Coimbra (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon