The Mathematical Core: Formal Foundations of the Five Principles v2.3

Formal definitions, propositions and theorems for the Five Principles framework, written as a candidate model of how organised systems emerge, evolve and integrate through relationships and constraints. The document defines coherent and decoherent cores and a transition zone, treats the label process as a metastable approximation, gives an Eyring–Kramers transition-rate result with its stated hypotheses and scope, and lists falsifiable predictions with their conditions. It is a candidate model, not a universal law, and it makes no claim about cosmological origin. Prior art is cited to primary sources, including Landauer, Kramers, and Bovier, Eckhoff, Gayrard and Klein (2004). Known limitations are listed in the document, including that the multidimensional escape-rate theorem as printed in its source does not cover every well-to-well direction used here, that one numerical experiment has no script attached, and that one invariance criterion has no source stating it exactly. The text was revised with AI review (DeepSeek, Kimi, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude). These are method checks, author-reported, and not independent peer review.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23974739
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Mathematical Core: Formal Foundations of the Five Principles v2.3

SHAI / HATI, John Richard Smith
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complex Systems and Dynamics
article

The Mathematical Core: Formal Foundations of the Five Principles v2.3

SHAI / HATI, John Richard Smith
article en

Abstract

Formal definitions, propositions and theorems for the Five Principles framework, written as a candidate model of how organised systems emerge, evolve and integrate through relationships and constraints. The document defines coherent and decoherent cores and a transition zone, treats the label process as a metastable approximation, gives an Eyring–Kramers transition-rate result with its stated hypotheses and scope, and lists falsifiable predictions with their conditions. It is a candidate model, not a universal law, and it makes no claim about cosmological origin. Prior art is cited to primary sources, including Landauer, Kramers, and Bovier, Eckhoff, Gayrard and Klein (2004). Known limitations are listed in the document, including that the multidimensional escape-rate theorem as printed in its source does not cover every well-to-well direction used here, that one numerical experiment has no script attached, and that one invariance criterion has no source stating it exactly. The text was revised with AI review (DeepSeek, Kimi, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude). These are method checks, author-reported, and not independent peer review.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Complex Systems and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon