SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY AND POLITICAL POWER MURAD AL-BUKHARI AND OTTOMAN MUJADDIDI NETWORKS

This article examines how Naqshbandi-Mujaddidi spiritual authority intersected with Ottoman elite society through the case of Murad al-Bukhari. It presents a qualitative historical synthesis of selected published studies and scholarly reference entries, with contextual comparisons to Central Asian Mujaddidi networks. The analysis distinguishes religious teaching, personal affiliation, institutional patronage and demonstrable political intervention. The selected literature documents elite connections and the institutional development of a lodge associated with Murad, while also reporting conflict with an Ottoman officeholder. These findings support an interpretation of spiritual authority as embedded in negotiated social relationships rather than equivalent to governmental control. The comparison with Khoqand indicates that governmental appointment constitutes a different form of evidence from discipleship or patronage. The article also identifies a chronological discrepancy between reference accounts of the Istanbul lodge. No archival documents or manuscripts were independently examined. The principal contribution is an evidence-sensitive framework for separating religious recognition, access to resources and claims of policy influence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23984742
Primary Topic
Islamic Thought and Society Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY AND POLITICAL POWER MURAD AL-BUKHARI AND OTTOMAN MUJADDIDI NETWORKS

Bakiev Xakim
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Islamic Thought and Society Studies
article

SPIRITUAL AUTHORITY AND POLITICAL POWER MURAD AL-BUKHARI AND OTTOMAN MUJADDIDI NETWORKS

Bakiev Xakim
article en

Abstract

This article examines how Naqshbandi-Mujaddidi spiritual authority intersected with Ottoman elite society through the case of Murad al-Bukhari. It presents a qualitative historical synthesis of selected published studies and scholarly reference entries, with contextual comparisons to Central Asian Mujaddidi networks. The analysis distinguishes religious teaching, personal affiliation, institutional patronage and demonstrable political intervention. The selected literature documents elite connections and the institutional development of a lodge associated with Murad, while also reporting conflict with an Ottoman officeholder. These findings support an interpretation of spiritual authority as embedded in negotiated social relationships rather than equivalent to governmental control. The comparison with Khoqand indicates that governmental appointment constitutes a different form of evidence from discipleship or patronage. The article also identifies a chronological discrepancy between reference accounts of the Istanbul lodge. No archival documents or manuscripts were independently examined. The principal contribution is an evidence-sensitive framework for separating religious recognition, access to resources and claims of policy influence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Islamic Thought and Society Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon