What are the limits to the use of audit and feedback in quality improvement? A critical reflection

ABSTRACT Audit and feedback is widely used across health care settings. It can be relatively inexpensive and drive improvement at scale. However, like other quality improvement interventions, audit and feedback carries the risk of unintended consequences and potential harms to patients, health professionals, and health care systems—for example, by wasting resources. There is a lack of clarity about the circumstances and contexts in which audit and feedback should not be delivered. We critically reflect on the limits, or what we will refer to as boundary conditions , to the use of audit and feedback. We propose boundary conditions to support decision-making by quality improvement leaders, clinicians, and researchers about the use of audit and feedback for quality improvement to optimize the use of scarce health care resources, maximize benefit, and reduce the risk of harms. Spanish abstract: https://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A717

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000664
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

What are the limits to the use of audit and feedback in quality improvement? A critical reflection

Beatriz Goulão, Jeremy Grimshaw, Jill Francis, Craig Robert Ramsay et al.
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

What are the limits to the use of audit and feedback in quality improvement? A critical reflection

Beatriz Goulão, Jeremy Grimshaw, Jill Francis, Craig Robert Ramsay, Sarah Louise Alderson, Heather L. Colquhoun, Robbie Foy, Eilidh Duncan, Jamie Brehaut
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Audit and feedback is widely used across health care settings. It can be relatively inexpensive and drive improvement at scale. However, like other quality improvement interventions, audit and feedback carries the risk of unintended consequences and potential harms to patients, health professionals, and health care systems—for example, by wasting resources. There is a lack of clarity about the circumstances and contexts in which audit and feedback should not be delivered. We critically reflect on the limits, or what we will refer to as boundary conditions , to the use of audit and feedback. We propose boundary conditions to support decision-making by quality improvement leaders, clinicians, and researchers about the use of audit and feedback for quality improvement to optimize the use of scarce health care resources, maximize benefit, and reduce the risk of harms. Spanish abstract: https://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A717

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
University of Leeds (GB), University of Ottawa (CA), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Toronto (CA), University of Aberdeen (GB), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), University of Glasgow (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon