What do Patients Remember 24 Hours and One Week After a Psychiatric Consultation, and Does Recall Influence Adherence? A Narrative Review

Objective: To synthesise evidence on what patients retain 24 hours and about one week after a psychiatric consultation, the determinants of that retention, whether recall influences treatment adherence, and which interventions improve recall and adherence.Methods: A narrative review, structured according to SANRA criteria, of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised trials and observational studies, prioritising studies that verified recall against recorded consultation content. Evidence was organised around a causal model running from communication through encoding, retention, comprehension, beliefs and intention to adherence.Results: Across medical settings, 40–80% of consultation information is forgotten almost immediately and about half of what is recalled is inaccurate. At one week, only 49% of decisions and recommendations are freely and accurately recalled (85% with prompting), with a steep educational gradient (38% vs 65%). Direct data at 24 hours, and psychiatry-specific data at either interval, are scarce. Disorder-related deficits in effortful encoding (depression) and free recall (schizophrenia; d = 1.21 vs 0.64 for recognition) compound ordinary forgetting. Communication quality predicts adherence (19% higher risk of non-adherence with poor communicators; 1.62-fold higher odds after training; OR 5.82 for conversational repair in schizophrenia), but knowledge correlates only weakly with adherence and is outweighed by necessity–concern beliefs, insight, depression and alliance. Personalised recordings, written material, explicit structuring and teach-back reliably improve recall but improve adherence inconsistently.Conclusion: Recall is a necessary but insufficient condition for adherence in psychiatry; its link to behaviour is heavily mediated by beliefs and confounded by mood.Practice implications: Psychiatrists should engineer recall deliberately—limit and prioritise content, structure it explicitly, provide personalised written or recorded summaries and verify understanding with teach-back—while simultaneously addressing medication beliefs, mood and the therapeutic alliance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202611.0460.v1
Primary Topic
Medication Adherence and Compliance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

What do Patients Remember 24 Hours and One Week After a Psychiatric Consultation, and Does Recall Influence Adherence? A Narrative Review

Sushil Kumar SV
Preprints.org
Medication Adherence and Compliance
preprint

What do Patients Remember 24 Hours and One Week After a Psychiatric Consultation, and Does Recall Influence Adherence? A Narrative Review

Sushil Kumar SV
preprint en

Abstract

Objective: To synthesise evidence on what patients retain 24 hours and about one week after a psychiatric consultation, the determinants of that retention, whether recall influences treatment adherence, and which interventions improve recall and adherence.Methods: A narrative review, structured according to SANRA criteria, of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised trials and observational studies, prioritising studies that verified recall against recorded consultation content. Evidence was organised around a causal model running from communication through encoding, retention, comprehension, beliefs and intention to adherence.Results: Across medical settings, 40–80% of consultation information is forgotten almost immediately and about half of what is recalled is inaccurate. At one week, only 49% of decisions and recommendations are freely and accurately recalled (85% with prompting), with a steep educational gradient (38% vs 65%). Direct data at 24 hours, and psychiatry-specific data at either interval, are scarce. Disorder-related deficits in effortful encoding (depression) and free recall (schizophrenia; d = 1.21 vs 0.64 for recognition) compound ordinary forgetting. Communication quality predicts adherence (19% higher risk of non-adherence with poor communicators; 1.62-fold higher odds after training; OR 5.82 for conversational repair in schizophrenia), but knowledge correlates only weakly with adherence and is outweighed by necessity–concern beliefs, insight, depression and alliance. Personalised recordings, written material, explicit structuring and teach-back reliably improve recall but improve adherence inconsistently.Conclusion: Recall is a necessary but insufficient condition for adherence in psychiatry; its link to behaviour is heavily mediated by beliefs and confounded by mood.Practice implications: Psychiatrists should engineer recall deliberately—limit and prioritise content, structure it explicitly, provide personalised written or recorded summaries and verify understanding with teach-back—while simultaneously addressing medication beliefs, mood and the therapeutic alliance.

Preprints.org
Medication Adherence and Compliance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon