Relationship between photographic head–neck posture measurements and radiographic cervical sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adults

Background Photographic assessment provides a non-invasive, radiation-free evaluation of head–neck posture. From this perspective, it is significant for clinicians. Its relationship with radiographic cervical sagittal alignment has not been comprehensively investigated. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between photographic head–neck posture measurements and radiographic cervical sagittal alignment parameters in asymptomatic adults and to assess the inter-observer reliability of both approaches. Methods Ninety asymptomatic adults aged 20–40 years were included. Radiographic parameters included Cobb C2–C7 angle, Cobb C0–C2 angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, and C2 slope. Photographic parameters included craniovertebral angle (CVA), cranial rotation angle (CRA), chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), and head tilt angle (HTA). Measurements were performed independently by two experienced clinicians. Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses were performed . Results After correction for multiple cross-domain comparisons, weak-to-moderate correlations were detected between some radiographic and photographic parameters. The strongest cross-domain correlation was observed between cSVA and CBVA (r = 0.477, 95% CI: 0.299 to 0.623, FDR-adjusted p < 0.001). Radiographic measurements demonstrated excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC: 0.927–0.963), whereas photographic measurements demonstrated good inter-observer reliability (ICC: 0.853–0.898). Conclusion Photographic and radiographic measurements assess related but distinct anatomical constructs. Photographic methods may provide reproducible, non-invasive and radiation-free information about external head–neck posture; however, they should not be considered substitutes for radiographic evaluation when precise assessment of internal cervical sagittal alignment is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261505266
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Relationship between photographic head–neck posture measurements and radiographic cervical sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adults

Özkan Oğuz, Yiğit Çevik, Neslihan Boyan, Mustafa Tekeli et al.
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Relationship between photographic head–neck posture measurements and radiographic cervical sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adults

Özkan Oğuz, Yiğit Çevik, Neslihan Boyan, Mustafa Tekeli, Zekiye Karaca Bozdağ, Ömer Kaya, Hüseyin Erdem, Nazire Kılıç Şafak
article en

Abstract

Background Photographic assessment provides a non-invasive, radiation-free evaluation of head–neck posture. From this perspective, it is significant for clinicians. Its relationship with radiographic cervical sagittal alignment has not been comprehensively investigated. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between photographic head–neck posture measurements and radiographic cervical sagittal alignment parameters in asymptomatic adults and to assess the inter-observer reliability of both approaches. Methods Ninety asymptomatic adults aged 20–40 years were included. Radiographic parameters included Cobb C2–C7 angle, Cobb C0–C2 angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, and C2 slope. Photographic parameters included craniovertebral angle (CVA), cranial rotation angle (CRA), chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), and head tilt angle (HTA). Measurements were performed independently by two experienced clinicians. Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses were performed . Results After correction for multiple cross-domain comparisons, weak-to-moderate correlations were detected between some radiographic and photographic parameters. The strongest cross-domain correlation was observed between cSVA and CBVA (r = 0.477, 95% CI: 0.299 to 0.623, FDR-adjusted p < 0.001). Radiographic measurements demonstrated excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC: 0.927–0.963), whereas photographic measurements demonstrated good inter-observer reliability (ICC: 0.853–0.898). Conclusion Photographic and radiographic measurements assess related but distinct anatomical constructs. Photographic methods may provide reproducible, non-invasive and radiation-free information about external head–neck posture; however, they should not be considered substitutes for radiographic evaluation when precise assessment of internal cervical sagittal alignment is required.

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University (TR), Cukurova University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon