Deep Learning for Railway Track Defect Detection: A Systematic Review of Validation Evidence and Implications for Kazakhstan (2020–2026)

Deep learning is widely used to detect track defects from images, laser profiles, vibration, and ultrasonic signals; however, it remains unclear how much of the reported performance carries over to lines in service. Following PRISMA 2020, 2,226 records from 2020–2026 were retrieved from OpenAlex, Crossref, and DOAJ, and 428 studies were analyzed. 63.1% of the works use only benchmark, laboratory, or simulated data, while only 23 studies have been tested on real equipment or track. The median accuracy is 96.0%. A comparison of model speeds with the required frame rates showed that 61.3% of the models are fast enough at 160 km/h. No studies based on data from Central Asian lines were found. For Kazakhstan, collecting local data, fine-tuning models, and conducting a supervised pilot in cooperation with KTZ are proposed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23983989
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Deep Learning for Railway Track Defect Detection: A Systematic Review of Validation Evidence and Implications for Kazakhstan (2020–2026)

Aidar Ospankulov, Nur-Akhmet Baimakhan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
article

Deep Learning for Railway Track Defect Detection: A Systematic Review of Validation Evidence and Implications for Kazakhstan (2020–2026)

Aidar Ospankulov, Nur-Akhmet Baimakhan
article en

Abstract

Deep learning is widely used to detect track defects from images, laser profiles, vibration, and ultrasonic signals; however, it remains unclear how much of the reported performance carries over to lines in service. Following PRISMA 2020, 2,226 records from 2020–2026 were retrieved from OpenAlex, Crossref, and DOAJ, and 428 studies were analyzed. 63.1% of the works use only benchmark, laboratory, or simulated data, while only 23 studies have been tested on real equipment or track. The median accuracy is 96.0%. A comparison of model speeds with the required frame rates showed that 61.3% of the models are fast enough at 160 km/h. No studies based on data from Central Asian lines were found. For Kazakhstan, collecting local data, fine-tuning models, and conducting a supervised pilot in cooperation with KTZ are proposed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Kazakh-British Technical University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon