Covariance ellipse-guided base station selection for tightly coupled PPP/INS/5G UAV positioning

Abstract Degraded satellite geometry can lead to anisotropic position uncertainty in PPP/INS solutions. Selecting base stations solely by distance does not explicitly account for the directional characteristics of this uncertainty. To address this limitation, this study proposes a covariance ellipse–guided base station selection strategy for tightly coupled PPP/INS/5G positioning. The strategy uses the major-axis direction of the PPP/INS horizontal covariance ellipse to identify the direction of greatest position uncertainty. Four-station combinations are screened using three-dimensional geometric conditioning and predicted posterior variance constraints, and eligible combinations are ranked by giving priority to variance reduction along this direction. The method is evaluated using terrestrial UAV flight data and semi-simulated 5G ranges in a terrestrial configuration and a simulated nearshore configuration with one-sided base station geometry, each tested with and without simulated GNSS blockage. Across the four cases, the proposed solution reduces the three-dimensional root mean square (RMS) position error by 48.22%–73.94% and the 95th-percentile horizontal position error by 40.75%–74.49% relative to PPP/INS. Compared with nearest-four base station selection, the largest additional reductions are 6.31% in three-dimensional RMS error and 4.80% in the 95th-percentile horizontal error, both obtained in the terrestrial case with simulated GNSS blockage. In the simulated nearshore cases, the additional three-dimensional RMS reductions remain below 0.10%. These results support using directional position uncertainty to guide 5G ranging selection, while showing that the additional gains vary across the tested configurations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement Science and Technology
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aebe53
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Covariance ellipse-guided base station selection for tightly coupled PPP/INS/5G UAV positioning

Jin Wang, Rui Tu, Pengfei Zhang, Huan Wang et al.
Measurement Science and Technology
GNSS positioning and interference
article

Covariance ellipse-guided base station selection for tightly coupled PPP/INS/5G UAV positioning

Jin Wang, Rui Tu, Pengfei Zhang, Huan Wang, Fangxin Li, Ju Yeon Hong, Xuezhi Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Degraded satellite geometry can lead to anisotropic position uncertainty in PPP/INS solutions. Selecting base stations solely by distance does not explicitly account for the directional characteristics of this uncertainty. To address this limitation, this study proposes a covariance ellipse–guided base station selection strategy for tightly coupled PPP/INS/5G positioning. The strategy uses the major-axis direction of the PPP/INS horizontal covariance ellipse to identify the direction of greatest position uncertainty. Four-station combinations are screened using three-dimensional geometric conditioning and predicted posterior variance constraints, and eligible combinations are ranked by giving priority to variance reduction along this direction. The method is evaluated using terrestrial UAV flight data and semi-simulated 5G ranges in a terrestrial configuration and a simulated nearshore configuration with one-sided base station geometry, each tested with and without simulated GNSS blockage. Across the four cases, the proposed solution reduces the three-dimensional root mean square (RMS) position error by 48.22%–73.94% and the 95th-percentile horizontal position error by 40.75%–74.49% relative to PPP/INS. Compared with nearest-four base station selection, the largest additional reductions are 6.31% in three-dimensional RMS error and 4.80% in the 95th-percentile horizontal error, both obtained in the terrestrial case with simulated GNSS blockage. In the simulated nearshore cases, the additional three-dimensional RMS reductions remain below 0.10%. These results support using directional position uncertainty to guide 5G ranging selection, while showing that the additional gains vary across the tested configurations.

Measurement Science and Technology
Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon