Sustainable for Whom? Industrial Competitiveness, Sustainable Industrialization and Carbon Inequality: Evidence From a Global Panel

ABSTRACT Industrialization is central to the sustainable development agenda, but its distributional environmental consequences remain insufficiently understood. This study examines how conventional industrial competitiveness and sustainable industrialization, the latter measured by the Sustainable Development Goal 9 Industry Index, relate to carbon inequality (CI), proxied by the carbon footprint of the top income decile. Using data for up to 99 countries over 1995‐2023, Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) and Panel Threshold Regression (PTR) are employed to uncover heterogeneity across the CI distribution and income‐dependent development regimes. The results show that both forms of industrialization are associated with higher CI, but with specific distributional patterns. The competitiveness‐CI relationship is positive across all quantiles and stronger at lower levels of CI, while the association with sustainable industrialization increases toward the upper tail. PTR estimates further show substantial regime dependence in the effect of industrial competitiveness, while the SDG 9‐CI relationship is comparatively stable across development regimes. Wealth inequality, urbanization, and globalization are associated with higher CI, whereas renewable energy and inclusive institutions generally exhibit mitigating effects. The findings remain largely robust to instrumental‐variable quantile regression, alternative CI measures, and a sample restricted to fully observed data. Overall, neither competitiveness‐driven nor sustainability‐oriented industrialization alone appears sufficient to deliver equitable environmental outcomes, highlighting the need for integrating distributional considerations and countries' development stages into industrial and climate policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71871
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Sustainable for Whom? Industrial Competitiveness, Sustainable Industrialization and Carbon Inequality: Evidence From a Global Panel

Özge Kozal, Daniel Balsalobre‐Lorente, Hakan İnke
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Sustainable for Whom? Industrial Competitiveness, Sustainable Industrialization and Carbon Inequality: Evidence From a Global Panel

Özge Kozal, Daniel Balsalobre‐Lorente, Hakan İnke
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Industrialization is central to the sustainable development agenda, but its distributional environmental consequences remain insufficiently understood. This study examines how conventional industrial competitiveness and sustainable industrialization, the latter measured by the Sustainable Development Goal 9 Industry Index, relate to carbon inequality (CI), proxied by the carbon footprint of the top income decile. Using data for up to 99 countries over 1995‐2023, Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) and Panel Threshold Regression (PTR) are employed to uncover heterogeneity across the CI distribution and income‐dependent development regimes. The results show that both forms of industrialization are associated with higher CI, but with specific distributional patterns. The competitiveness‐CI relationship is positive across all quantiles and stronger at lower levels of CI, while the association with sustainable industrialization increases toward the upper tail. PTR estimates further show substantial regime dependence in the effect of industrial competitiveness, while the SDG 9‐CI relationship is comparatively stable across development regimes. Wealth inequality, urbanization, and globalization are associated with higher CI, whereas renewable energy and inclusive institutions generally exhibit mitigating effects. The findings remain largely robust to instrumental‐variable quantile regression, alternative CI measures, and a sample restricted to fully observed data. Overall, neither competitiveness‐driven nor sustainability‐oriented industrialization alone appears sufficient to deliver equitable environmental outcomes, highlighting the need for integrating distributional considerations and countries' development stages into industrial and climate policy.

Sustainable Development
Ege University (TR), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), Universidad Ecotec (EC), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon