3D seismic imagery of a buried glacitectonic thrust complex in the North Sea and the dimensions of composite ridge systems in glaciated landscapes

ABSTRACT Sets of sub‐parallel composite ridges in glaciated landscapes have long been regarded as landforms produced by glacitectonism, the brittle and ductile deformation of sediments at and immediately beyond glacier and ice‐sheet margins resulting from stresses produced by ice. The morphology and internal structure of a glacitectonic thrust complex buried beneath up to 130 m of sediment on Egersundbanken, North Sea, is examined using a 3D seismic cube (ABP23001, area 580 km 2 ). Several ridge complexes are identified, totalling 117 km 2 in area and volume about 7 km 3 . The ridges are the tops of individual imbricate thrust sheets that extend below local palaeo‐surfaces. Depressions between ridges relate to thrust faults. Ridge‐system bases are defined by a decollement surface. Ridge orientation implies past ice flow from the ENE, from an ice sheet centred over Scandinavia probably during the Saalian glaciation. The geomorphology of Egersundbanken glacitectonic thrust complex, combined with evidence on the dimensions of other composite ridges from terrestrial and marine settings around the North Sea, provides a geometric baseline against which other types of glacier‐produced ridges orientated transverse to ice‐flow direction can be distinguished (e.g., corrugation, annual, De Geer, crevasse‐squeeze and recessional‐ and terminal‐moraine ridges). There are orders of magnitude differences between ridge types. Glacitectonic complexes are large relative to many other glacial ridges, often 10 2 km 2 in area and with volumes of 10 km 3 . Corrugation and crevasse‐squeeze ridges are much smaller than composite ridges, whereas major ice‐recessional moraine ridges are often more widely spaced and much larger than glacitectonic complexes. Glacitectonic thrust complexes therefore have a relatively distinctive surface morphology and internal architecture when compared with other transverse‐to‐flow ridges in glaciated landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Quaternary Science
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.70136
Primary Topic
Geological formations and processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

3D seismic imagery of a buried glacitectonic thrust complex in the North Sea and the dimensions of composite ridge systems in glaciated landscapes

Julian A. Dowdeswell, Dag Ottesen
Journal of Quaternary Science
Geological formations and processes
article

3D seismic imagery of a buried glacitectonic thrust complex in the North Sea and the dimensions of composite ridge systems in glaciated landscapes

Julian A. Dowdeswell, Dag Ottesen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sets of sub‐parallel composite ridges in glaciated landscapes have long been regarded as landforms produced by glacitectonism, the brittle and ductile deformation of sediments at and immediately beyond glacier and ice‐sheet margins resulting from stresses produced by ice. The morphology and internal structure of a glacitectonic thrust complex buried beneath up to 130 m of sediment on Egersundbanken, North Sea, is examined using a 3D seismic cube (ABP23001, area 580 km 2 ). Several ridge complexes are identified, totalling 117 km 2 in area and volume about 7 km 3 . The ridges are the tops of individual imbricate thrust sheets that extend below local palaeo‐surfaces. Depressions between ridges relate to thrust faults. Ridge‐system bases are defined by a decollement surface. Ridge orientation implies past ice flow from the ENE, from an ice sheet centred over Scandinavia probably during the Saalian glaciation. The geomorphology of Egersundbanken glacitectonic thrust complex, combined with evidence on the dimensions of other composite ridges from terrestrial and marine settings around the North Sea, provides a geometric baseline against which other types of glacier‐produced ridges orientated transverse to ice‐flow direction can be distinguished (e.g., corrugation, annual, De Geer, crevasse‐squeeze and recessional‐ and terminal‐moraine ridges). There are orders of magnitude differences between ridge types. Glacitectonic complexes are large relative to many other glacial ridges, often 10 2 km 2 in area and with volumes of 10 km 3 . Corrugation and crevasse‐squeeze ridges are much smaller than composite ridges, whereas major ice‐recessional moraine ridges are often more widely spaced and much larger than glacitectonic complexes. Glacitectonic thrust complexes therefore have a relatively distinctive surface morphology and internal architecture when compared with other transverse‐to‐flow ridges in glaciated landscapes.

Journal of Quaternary Science
Geological Survey of Norway (NO), University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Geological formations and processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon