THE FUTURE OF AVIATION LAW AND THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION COURTS

The exponential growth of international air transport, coupled with the increasing sophistication of cross-border aviation finance, codeshare partnerships and infrastructure concessions, has exposed the structural limits of the existing conventional and judicial framework governing aviation disputes. This article examines the future trajectory of aviation law and interrogates the expanding role of arbitration as a preferred mechanism for resolving commercial, financial and regulatory disputes in the aviation sector. Employing a doctrinal methodology grounded in primary treaty texts, judicial precedent and institutional arbitration rules, the article traces the evolution of the Warsaw–Montreal liability regime, the Cape Town Convention's asset-based remedies, and the growing recourse to institutional arbitration under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce, the London Court of International Arbitration and the International Air Transport Association. The analysis demonstrates that while passenger-liability disputes remain firmly tethered to national courts because of consumer protection imperatives, business-to-business aviation disputes are migrating decisively toward arbitration on account of its neutrality, enforceability under the New York Convention, confidentiality and access to technically specialised adjudicators. The article concludes that the future of aviation law lies in a hybrid dispute-resolution architecture that preserves judicial oversight for passenger claims while consolidating arbitration as the default forum for commercial, financing and infrastructure disputes, including those emerging from urban air mobility and carbon-offset compliance.