A Multilevel Socio-Technical System: Formation of Government Financial Reporting Quality in China—Survey Evidence from the 2019 Accrual Accounting Reform

Using questionnaire data collected in 2019, this study examines how preparation conditions relate to perceived government financial reporting quality (GFRQ) in the first year of China’s new government accounting system. The multilevel socio-technical systems (MSTS) framework distinguishes departmental reporting as an operational layer and consolidated reporting as an integration layer. Separate respondent-level regressions use 5157 departmental and 672 consolidated questionnaires; they estimate associations within each report type, without testing interactions or information transmission between layers. Policy cognition and institutional support, and information systems and data integration are positively associated with GFRQ in both samples. Accounting foundation and accrual implementation are significant in the departmental sample. The prespecified coordination and supervision index is positive in both baseline models, although departmental inference is sensitive to scoring. These findings describe preparation conditions and quality evaluations in the 2019 survey. Comparisons across report types are descriptive; coefficient equality has not been formally tested. Cross-layer transmission and feedback remain theoretical propositions, while suggestions on responsibility tracing, reconciliation and error correction are directions for subsequent evaluation. The results are bounded by the survey’s institutional and technical context and do not establish later reform outcomes or current governance performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14111411
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Multilevel Socio-Technical System: Formation of Government Financial Reporting Quality in China—Survey Evidence from the 2019 Accrual Accounting Reform

Wanying Song, Can Liu, 海波 贾, Jiaming Sun et al.
Systems
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

A Multilevel Socio-Technical System: Formation of Government Financial Reporting Quality in China—Survey Evidence from the 2019 Accrual Accounting Reform

Wanying Song, Can Liu, 海波 贾, Jiaming Sun, Weifeng Huang
article en

Abstract

Using questionnaire data collected in 2019, this study examines how preparation conditions relate to perceived government financial reporting quality (GFRQ) in the first year of China’s new government accounting system. The multilevel socio-technical systems (MSTS) framework distinguishes departmental reporting as an operational layer and consolidated reporting as an integration layer. Separate respondent-level regressions use 5157 departmental and 672 consolidated questionnaires; they estimate associations within each report type, without testing interactions or information transmission between layers. Policy cognition and institutional support, and information systems and data integration are positively associated with GFRQ in both samples. Accounting foundation and accrual implementation are significant in the departmental sample. The prespecified coordination and supervision index is positive in both baseline models, although departmental inference is sensitive to scoring. These findings describe preparation conditions and quality evaluations in the 2019 survey. Comparisons across report types are descriptive; coefficient equality has not been formally tested. Cross-layer transmission and feedback remain theoretical propositions, while suggestions on responsibility tracing, reconciliation and error correction are directions for subsequent evaluation. The results are bounded by the survey’s institutional and technical context and do not establish later reform outcomes or current governance performance.

SystemsVol. 14(11)
North China University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon