Bias in book recommendation: A survey

Automated book recommendation is a compelling application given the rich and long-standing human tradition of writing and reading. The documented discrimination in the publishing world raises questions on the types of bias that can arise when algorithms are trained on user-book interactions. Various papers have studied recommender systems bias based on datasets from platforms where users share their opinions on books. In this paper, we conduct the first survey of computer science research on bias in book recommender systems. We survey 40 papers from top conferences and journals using the structured PRISMA methodology and provide an overview of the field. We map the existing literature into bias types, subjects and actions, and present key metrics and bias mitigation methods. We find that there is limited targeted research, fragmented evaluation practices, and a lack of engagement with the unique characteristics of the literary domain. Finally, we propose avenues for future work and make concrete suggestions for interdisciplinary research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3858614
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Bias in book recommendation: A survey

Savvina Daniil, Laura Hollink, Gauri Bhagwat
ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Bias in book recommendation: A survey

Savvina Daniil, Laura Hollink, Gauri Bhagwat
article en

Abstract

Automated book recommendation is a compelling application given the rich and long-standing human tradition of writing and reading. The documented discrimination in the publishing world raises questions on the types of bias that can arise when algorithms are trained on user-book interactions. Various papers have studied recommender systems bias based on datasets from platforms where users share their opinions on books. In this paper, we conduct the first survey of computer science research on bias in book recommender systems. We survey 40 papers from top conferences and journals using the structured PRISMA methodology and provide an overview of the field. We map the existing literature into bias types, subjects and actions, and present key metrics and bias mitigation methods. We find that there is limited targeted research, fragmented evaluation practices, and a lack of engagement with the unique characteristics of the literary domain. Finally, we propose avenues for future work and make concrete suggestions for interdisciplinary research.

ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems
Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (NL), KNAW Humanities Cluster (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon