From Earth-Centric to Space-Centric Geopolitics: Rethinking Power Beyond the Planet

The rapid expansion of state and commercial activity in outer space is reshaping foundational assumptions about geopolitical power and international order. This article examines how emerging space practices, ranging from satellite warfare and resource extraction to planetary colonization, challenge Earth-centric frameworks that have long dominated international relations theory. Drawing on recent U.S. policy shifts and a critical case study of the 2025 Senate hearings for NASA Administrator nominee Jared Isaacman, the analysis identifies a key fault line between competing strategic divisions: NASA’s multilateral Artemis framework and SpaceX’s Mars-directed approach. To interpret these developments, the article proposes a typology of geopolitical perspectives, Earth-centric, Earth-bound, and space-centric, and argues that a space-centric lens offers a richer understanding of how outer space is becoming a source, not just a site, of political order. The findings suggest that expanding the conceptual boundaries of geopolitics is essential for understanding contemporary transformations in global power and institutional authority.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5q9rw
Primary Topic
Space exploration and regulation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

From Earth-Centric to Space-Centric Geopolitics: Rethinking Power Beyond the Planet

Darshan Vigneswaran, Enrike van Wingerden
Space exploration and regulation
preprint

From Earth-Centric to Space-Centric Geopolitics: Rethinking Power Beyond the Planet

Darshan Vigneswaran, Enrike van Wingerden
preprint en

Abstract

The rapid expansion of state and commercial activity in outer space is reshaping foundational assumptions about geopolitical power and international order. This article examines how emerging space practices, ranging from satellite warfare and resource extraction to planetary colonization, challenge Earth-centric frameworks that have long dominated international relations theory. Drawing on recent U.S. policy shifts and a critical case study of the 2025 Senate hearings for NASA Administrator nominee Jared Isaacman, the analysis identifies a key fault line between competing strategic divisions: NASA’s multilateral Artemis framework and SpaceX’s Mars-directed approach. To interpret these developments, the article proposes a typology of geopolitical perspectives, Earth-centric, Earth-bound, and space-centric, and argues that a space-centric lens offers a richer understanding of how outer space is becoming a source, not just a site, of political order. The findings suggest that expanding the conceptual boundaries of geopolitics is essential for understanding contemporary transformations in global power and institutional authority.

Space exploration and regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon