IN DEFENSE OF MONOPOLY: MERCHANT GUILDS AND THE EMERGENCE OF LIBERALISM IN PORTUGAL

Despite being questioned and criticized since classical antiquity, monopolistic institutions and practices have persisted for centuries. Indeed, they remain a contentious issue in modern-day political debates. Some have argued that the longevity of monopolistic institutions, such as guilds, was the result of political arrangements with public authorities. Others, however, claim that they persisted because they were useful and efficient institutions (for example, they were a means of knowledge transfer that ultimately helped Europe surpass Asia in wealth, technology, and global influence). Much less discussed is how such institutions defended themselves in the public arena against widespread criticism. Drawing upon underexplored source material held in the Portuguese National Archives (Arquivo Nacional da Torre do Tombo, ANTT), this article examines how Portuguese commercial guilds justified their monopolies and privileges in the early 1820s. The article shows that while the defense of monopolies did involve economic justifications, it nonetheless mostly emphasized the social impacts of commercial monopolies (positive externalities), in particular the formation of a reliable class of merchants and citizens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s105383722610128x
Primary Topic
Historical Economic and Legal Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

IN DEFENSE OF MONOPOLY: MERCHANT GUILDS AND THE EMERGENCE OF LIBERALISM IN PORTUGAL

Miguel Dantas da Cruz
Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Historical Economic and Legal Thought
article

IN DEFENSE OF MONOPOLY: MERCHANT GUILDS AND THE EMERGENCE OF LIBERALISM IN PORTUGAL

Miguel Dantas da Cruz
article en

Abstract

Despite being questioned and criticized since classical antiquity, monopolistic institutions and practices have persisted for centuries. Indeed, they remain a contentious issue in modern-day political debates. Some have argued that the longevity of monopolistic institutions, such as guilds, was the result of political arrangements with public authorities. Others, however, claim that they persisted because they were useful and efficient institutions (for example, they were a means of knowledge transfer that ultimately helped Europe surpass Asia in wealth, technology, and global influence). Much less discussed is how such institutions defended themselves in the public arena against widespread criticism. Drawing upon underexplored source material held in the Portuguese National Archives (Arquivo Nacional da Torre do Tombo, ANTT), this article examines how Portuguese commercial guilds justified their monopolies and privileges in the early 1820s. The article shows that while the defense of monopolies did involve economic justifications, it nonetheless mostly emphasized the social impacts of commercial monopolies (positive externalities), in particular the formation of a reliable class of merchants and citizens.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
University of Lisbon (PT), Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Historical Economic and Legal Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon