METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING THE EFFICIENCY OF GRAIN EXPORT LOGISTICS

Grain export logistics cannot be assessed by freight rates alone because route choice also affects handling time, cargo quality, and disruption risk. This is especially relevant to Ukraine, where flows are distributed among maritime, Danube, rail, and road corridors. A suitable framework must therefore connect cost with operational performance, resilience, environmental impact, and data quality. The study aims to substantiate a methodological framework for assessing grain export logistics at shipment, route, company, and national levels and to define a transparent procedure for combining heterogeneous indicators. Logistics efficiency is defined as the ability of an export chain to deliver the contracted quantity and quality of grain within the agreed time at a justified total cost and an acceptable risk. Eight blocks are proposed: cost, time, reliability, grain preservation, capacity, institutional quality, resilience and security, and environmental performance. After the assessment boundaries and data quality are fixed, indicators are normalised and weighted by combining AHP with CRITIC. Geometric aggregation limits compensation, so weak reliability cannot be concealed by a favourable tariff. The index is adjusted for transittime variability, disruption probability, and grain losses. The scientific novelty is the integration of multi-level assessment, limited-compensation aggregation, risk correction, and a data-coverage rule. DEA and sensitivity testing benchmark homogeneous objects and verify ranking robustness. The framework converts fragmented records into an assessment that is interpretable for managers and public authorities. Its practical value lies in route selection, contract review, bottleneck diagnosis, and infrastructure prioritisation. Implementation requires common indicator passports and interoperable data. Further research should estimate weights and risk parameters and test the model on panel data for Ukraine's principal grain export corridors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Navigator
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32782/business-navigator.89-3
Primary Topic
Logistics and Infrastructure Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING THE EFFICIENCY OF GRAIN EXPORT LOGISTICS

Р.В. Фігура
Business Navigator
Logistics and Infrastructure Analysis
article

METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING THE EFFICIENCY OF GRAIN EXPORT LOGISTICS

Р.В. Фігура
article en

Abstract

Grain export logistics cannot be assessed by freight rates alone because route choice also affects handling time, cargo quality, and disruption risk. This is especially relevant to Ukraine, where flows are distributed among maritime, Danube, rail, and road corridors. A suitable framework must therefore connect cost with operational performance, resilience, environmental impact, and data quality. The study aims to substantiate a methodological framework for assessing grain export logistics at shipment, route, company, and national levels and to define a transparent procedure for combining heterogeneous indicators. Logistics efficiency is defined as the ability of an export chain to deliver the contracted quantity and quality of grain within the agreed time at a justified total cost and an acceptable risk. Eight blocks are proposed: cost, time, reliability, grain preservation, capacity, institutional quality, resilience and security, and environmental performance. After the assessment boundaries and data quality are fixed, indicators are normalised and weighted by combining AHP with CRITIC. Geometric aggregation limits compensation, so weak reliability cannot be concealed by a favourable tariff. The index is adjusted for transittime variability, disruption probability, and grain losses. The scientific novelty is the integration of multi-level assessment, limited-compensation aggregation, risk correction, and a data-coverage rule. DEA and sensitivity testing benchmark homogeneous objects and verify ranking robustness. The framework converts fragmented records into an assessment that is interpretable for managers and public authorities. Its practical value lies in route selection, contract review, bottleneck diagnosis, and infrastructure prioritisation. Implementation requires common indicator passports and interoperable data. Further research should estimate weights and risk parameters and test the model on panel data for Ukraine's principal grain export corridors.

Business Navigator(6(89))
Stepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies Lviv (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Logistics and Infrastructure Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon