Risk-benefit assessment of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation using virtual clinical trials

Abstract Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) reduces stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and screening can enable earlier AF detection and OAC initiation. However, the population-level trade-off between stroke prevention and OAC-related major bleeding for different types of AF and OAC therapy remains uncertain, and large randomized trials to resolve this are costly and time-consuming. Methods: A state-transition Markov-like model was developed to: 1) simulate the lifetime course of AF, stroke, major bleeding, and death in different virtual populations; 2) quantify benefits (stroke reduction) and harms (major bleeding) of systematic AF screening with screening-triggered OAC across CHA2DS2-VA scores; and 3) compare rhythm-guided, time-delimited ("pill-in-pocket") OAC with continuous OAC. Results: The model synthesized information from multiple clinical sources and reproduced stroke and bleeding incidence across clinical scenarios. At CHA?DS?-VA=2, long-term continuous rhythm monitoring (LT-CRM) with OAC lowered stroke risk (HR, 0.92 [95%CI, 0.88-0.96]) but raised bleeding risk (HR, 1.17 [95%CI, 1.07-1.27]) versus no screening. Time-to-benefit was shorter than time-to-harm for CHA?DS?-VA?4, but longer for CHA?DS?-VA=0. Pill-in-pocket OAC vs continuous OAC showed no difference in stroke/mortality (HR, 1.03, 95%CI [0.91-1.16]) but lower bleeding risk (HR, 0.81, 95%CI: 0.68-0.96]) in patients with elevated bleeding risk, but not at baseline. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the risk-benefit profiles of screening or pill-in-pocket OAC strategy further depend on OAC adherence and bleeding risks. Conclusions: Our model highlights a trade-off between stroke reduction and bleeding for systematic screening-initiated OAC, with net benefit for CHA?DS?-VA?4. We provide the first virtual implementation of an ongoing rhythm-guided OAC trial, showing that pill-in-pocket OAC may lower bleeding risk compared to continuous OAC, highlighting the potential of virtual clinical trials to guide clinical trial design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.04.26367324
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Risk-benefit assessment of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation using virtual clinical trials

Stefano Severi, Jordi Heijman, Ulrich Schotten, Michiel Rienstra et al.
medRxiv
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
preprint

Risk-benefit assessment of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation using virtual clinical trials

Stefano Severi, Jordi Heijman, Ulrich Schotten, Michiel Rienstra, Harry J.G.M. Crijns, Minsi Cai, Fateme Farahani
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) reduces stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and screening can enable earlier AF detection and OAC initiation. However, the population-level trade-off between stroke prevention and OAC-related major bleeding for different types of AF and OAC therapy remains uncertain, and large randomized trials to resolve this are costly and time-consuming. Methods: A state-transition Markov-like model was developed to: 1) simulate the lifetime course of AF, stroke, major bleeding, and death in different virtual populations; 2) quantify benefits (stroke reduction) and harms (major bleeding) of systematic AF screening with screening-triggered OAC across CHA2DS2-VA scores; and 3) compare rhythm-guided, time-delimited ("pill-in-pocket") OAC with continuous OAC. Results: The model synthesized information from multiple clinical sources and reproduced stroke and bleeding incidence across clinical scenarios. At CHA?DS?-VA=2, long-term continuous rhythm monitoring (LT-CRM) with OAC lowered stroke risk (HR, 0.92 [95%CI, 0.88-0.96]) but raised bleeding risk (HR, 1.17 [95%CI, 1.07-1.27]) versus no screening. Time-to-benefit was shorter than time-to-harm for CHA?DS?-VA?4, but longer for CHA?DS?-VA=0. Pill-in-pocket OAC vs continuous OAC showed no difference in stroke/mortality (HR, 1.03, 95%CI [0.91-1.16]) but lower bleeding risk (HR, 0.81, 95%CI: 0.68-0.96]) in patients with elevated bleeding risk, but not at baseline. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the risk-benefit profiles of screening or pill-in-pocket OAC strategy further depend on OAC adherence and bleeding risks. Conclusions: Our model highlights a trade-off between stroke reduction and bleeding for systematic screening-initiated OAC, with net benefit for CHA?DS?-VA?4. We provide the first virtual implementation of an ongoing rhythm-guided OAC trial, showing that pill-in-pocket OAC may lower bleeding risk compared to continuous OAC, highlighting the potential of virtual clinical trials to guide clinical trial design.

medRxiv
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Medical University of Graz (AT), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Maastricht University (NL), University of Bologna (IT)
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon