The study on consistency and reliability of GNSS receiver antenna type-mean and individual phase center corrections

Abstract This study investigates the consistency and reliability of GNSS receiver antenna type-mean phase center corrections by analyzing both individual and type-mean Phase Center Correction (PCC) models. Using data from approximately 70 geodetic-grade antennas within the Polish ASG-EUPOS network, we quantify variations in calibration models across multiple GNSS signals. Differences between individual and type-mean calibrations are assessed in both the pattern and position domains. The analysis reveals signal-specific discrepancies, particularly for GPS L2 (G02), where deviations reach up to 5 mm in dPCC RMS and 30 mm in MAX values, impacting ionosphere-free (IF) linear-combinations. Position-domain validation via Precise Point Positioning further demonstrates vertical offsets exceeding 5 mm due to outdated or incomplete PCC models, with systematic biases arising from cross-system substitutions, e.g., GPS corrections used for GALILEO signals. The findings emphasize the need for consistent, up-to-date calibration models, and propose robust, signal-specific metrics to support the reliable use of GNSS data in regional and global reference frames.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GPS Solutions
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-026-02174-x
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The study on consistency and reliability of GNSS receiver antenna type-mean and individual phase center corrections

Grzegorz Krzan, Karol Dawidowicz, Tobias Kersten
GPS Solutions
GNSS positioning and interference
article

The study on consistency and reliability of GNSS receiver antenna type-mean and individual phase center corrections

Grzegorz Krzan, Karol Dawidowicz, Tobias Kersten
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the consistency and reliability of GNSS receiver antenna type-mean phase center corrections by analyzing both individual and type-mean Phase Center Correction (PCC) models. Using data from approximately 70 geodetic-grade antennas within the Polish ASG-EUPOS network, we quantify variations in calibration models across multiple GNSS signals. Differences between individual and type-mean calibrations are assessed in both the pattern and position domains. The analysis reveals signal-specific discrepancies, particularly for GPS L2 (G02), where deviations reach up to 5 mm in dPCC RMS and 30 mm in MAX values, impacting ionosphere-free (IF) linear-combinations. Position-domain validation via Precise Point Positioning further demonstrates vertical offsets exceeding 5 mm due to outdated or incomplete PCC models, with systematic biases arising from cross-system substitutions, e.g., GPS corrections used for GALILEO signals. The findings emphasize the need for consistent, up-to-date calibration models, and propose robust, signal-specific metrics to support the reliable use of GNSS data in regional and global reference frames.

GPS SolutionsVol. 31(1)
Anhalt University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon