Epidural Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine versus Fentanyl for Labour Analgesia: Effect on Neonatal Apgar Score, Neonatal Adaptive Capacity Score and Cord Blood Gases – A Randomised Comparative Study

Background: Epidural fentanyl improves ropivacaine labour analgesia but causes opioid-related adverse effects; the neonatal effects of epidural dexmedetomidine are less well documented. Aims and Objective: To compare epidural ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl for labour analgesia, with emphasis on Apgar score, Neonatal Adaptive Capacity Score (NACS) and umbilical arterial blood gases. Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomised study (May 2025–April 2026), 100 parturients in active labour received epidural 0.1% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/mL (Group RD, n=50) or fentanyl 2 µg/mL (Group RF, n=50). The primary outcome was the 1-minute Apgar score; all other outcomes were secondary. Pain scores were also analysed, post hoc, with adjustment for baseline Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Results: Onset of analgesia was faster in Group RD (12.50±0.99 vs 15.36±1.35 min; p<0.001), ropivacaine consumption was lower (47.48±3.99 vs 55.59±5.73 mL; p<0.001) and fewer women needed rescue boluses (4% vs 76%; p<0.001). Baseline VAS was higher in Group RD; in a post hoc baseline-adjusted analysis, VAS remained lower in Group RD at 5, 10, 60, 90 and 120 minutes (overall adjusted difference −0.51, 95% CI −0.63 to −0.40). No significant differences were detected in the primary outcome, 1-minute Apgar score (7.94±0.24 vs 8.00±0.00; p=0.08), or in 5-minute Apgar score, NACS (p=0.06), cord pH (p=0.055) or base deficit; umbilical arterial pCO2 was lower in Group RD (49.10 vs 51.05 mmHg; p<0.001), a difference of uncertain clinical significance. Pruritus (0 vs 5) and nausea/vomiting (2 vs 9) were numerically, but not significantly, less frequent with dexmedetomidine. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine provided faster labour analgesia with less ropivacaine than fentanyl. No significant neonatal differences were detected, but the study was not powered to establish neonatal safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Academic Research
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23978007
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Epidural Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine versus Fentanyl for Labour Analgesia: Effect on Neonatal Apgar Score, Neonatal Adaptive Capacity Score and Cord Blood Gases – A Randomised Comparative Study

Preeti Kanal, Aradhna Kankane, Ashok Mittal, Chavi Sethi et al.
International Journal of Medical Sciences and Academic Research
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Epidural Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine versus Fentanyl for Labour Analgesia: Effect on Neonatal Apgar Score, Neonatal Adaptive Capacity Score and Cord Blood Gases – A Randomised Comparative Study

Preeti Kanal, Aradhna Kankane, Ashok Mittal, Chavi Sethi, Akash Deep, Ahmad Faraz Shamsi
article en

Abstract

Background: Epidural fentanyl improves ropivacaine labour analgesia but causes opioid-related adverse effects; the neonatal effects of epidural dexmedetomidine are less well documented. Aims and Objective: To compare epidural ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl for labour analgesia, with emphasis on Apgar score, Neonatal Adaptive Capacity Score (NACS) and umbilical arterial blood gases. Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomised study (May 2025–April 2026), 100 parturients in active labour received epidural 0.1% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/mL (Group RD, n=50) or fentanyl 2 µg/mL (Group RF, n=50). The primary outcome was the 1-minute Apgar score; all other outcomes were secondary. Pain scores were also analysed, post hoc, with adjustment for baseline Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. Results: Onset of analgesia was faster in Group RD (12.50±0.99 vs 15.36±1.35 min; p<0.001), ropivacaine consumption was lower (47.48±3.99 vs 55.59±5.73 mL; p<0.001) and fewer women needed rescue boluses (4% vs 76%; p<0.001). Baseline VAS was higher in Group RD; in a post hoc baseline-adjusted analysis, VAS remained lower in Group RD at 5, 10, 60, 90 and 120 minutes (overall adjusted difference −0.51, 95% CI −0.63 to −0.40). No significant differences were detected in the primary outcome, 1-minute Apgar score (7.94±0.24 vs 8.00±0.00; p=0.08), or in 5-minute Apgar score, NACS (p=0.06), cord pH (p=0.055) or base deficit; umbilical arterial pCO2 was lower in Group RD (49.10 vs 51.05 mmHg; p<0.001), a difference of uncertain clinical significance. Pruritus (0 vs 5) and nausea/vomiting (2 vs 9) were numerically, but not significantly, less frequent with dexmedetomidine. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine provided faster labour analgesia with less ropivacaine than fentanyl. No significant neonatal differences were detected, but the study was not powered to establish neonatal safety.

International Journal of Medical Sciences and Academic Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon