Prognostic value of the Osaka Prognostic Score for two-year mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Background Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, highlighting the need for simple and reliable prognostic tools. The Osaka Prognostic Score (OPS), an inflammation- and nutrition-based score incorporating C-reactive protein (CRP), serum albumin, and lymphocyte count, has demonstrated prognostic value in several cardiovascular conditions. However, its significance in patients with HFrEF remains unclear. This study investigated the association between OPS and two-year all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Methods This retrospective single-center study included 198 patients with HFrEF. OPS was calculated using serum CRP, albumin, and total lymphocyte count obtained at baseline. The primary outcome was two-year all-cause mortality. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Independent predictors of mortality were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong testing were performed to compare the predictive performance of OPS and its individual components. Results During the two-year follow-up, 42 patients (21.2%) died. Non-survivors had significantly higher OPS values than survivors (2 [1–2] vs. 0 [0–1], p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated progressively reduced survival across increasing OPS categories (log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, diabetes mellitus (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.67, 95% CI 1.28–5.57; p = 0.009) and OPS (aHR 2.63, 95% CI 1.86–3.73; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of two-year mortality. ROC analysis showed that OPS had the highest discriminative ability for mortality prediction (AUC 0.824), outperforming lymphocyte count ( p = 0.005) and demonstrating comparable performance to CRP and albumin ( p = 0.828 and p = 0.057). Conclusion OPS was independently associated with two-year mortality and demonstrated good prognostic performance in patients with HFrEF. As a readily available score integrating inflammatory, nutritional, and immunological parameters, OPS may represent a useful prognostic marker in this population. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1948699
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Prognostic value of the Osaka Prognostic Score for two-year mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Pelin Aladağ, Ahmet Furkan Süner, Ahmet Avcı, İlke Erbay
Frontiers in Nutrition
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Prognostic value of the Osaka Prognostic Score for two-year mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Pelin Aladağ, Ahmet Furkan Süner, Ahmet Avcı, İlke Erbay
article en

Abstract

Background Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, highlighting the need for simple and reliable prognostic tools. The Osaka Prognostic Score (OPS), an inflammation- and nutrition-based score incorporating C-reactive protein (CRP), serum albumin, and lymphocyte count, has demonstrated prognostic value in several cardiovascular conditions. However, its significance in patients with HFrEF remains unclear. This study investigated the association between OPS and two-year all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Methods This retrospective single-center study included 198 patients with HFrEF. OPS was calculated using serum CRP, albumin, and total lymphocyte count obtained at baseline. The primary outcome was two-year all-cause mortality. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Independent predictors of mortality were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong testing were performed to compare the predictive performance of OPS and its individual components. Results During the two-year follow-up, 42 patients (21.2%) died. Non-survivors had significantly higher OPS values than survivors (2 [1–2] vs. 0 [0–1], p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated progressively reduced survival across increasing OPS categories (log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, diabetes mellitus (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.67, 95% CI 1.28–5.57; p = 0.009) and OPS (aHR 2.63, 95% CI 1.86–3.73; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of two-year mortality. ROC analysis showed that OPS had the highest discriminative ability for mortality prediction (AUC 0.824), outperforming lymphocyte count ( p = 0.005) and demonstrating comparable performance to CRP and albumin ( p = 0.828 and p = 0.057). Conclusion OPS was independently associated with two-year mortality and demonstrated good prognostic performance in patients with HFrEF. As a readily available score integrating inflammatory, nutritional, and immunological parameters, OPS may represent a useful prognostic marker in this population. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Frontiers in NutritionVol. 13
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (TR), Düzce Üniversitesi (TR), Kastamonu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon