Reconsidering the Protection of Child Witnesses and Pre-Recorded Testimony: Comparative Perspectives from Spain and England and Wales

This study conducts a comparative law analysis between Spain and England and Wales, focusing on pre-recorded evidence as a procedural tool designed to prevent the secondary victimization of underage witnesses in criminal proceedings. In the Spanish system, recorded statements are intended to prevent children from having to repeat their testimony, ensure their protection and preserve the evidential value of their statements. Special measures are taken in England and Wales, such as video-recorded examination and pre-recorded cross-examination. These methods pursue similar objectives by reducing the child’s exposure to the judicial environment. The study identifies the similarities in their protective purpose and the differences that result from procedural structures. It also detects the lessons that each legal system can apply to optimize the use of these instruments and strengthen the protection of children and adolescents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v12i3.1479
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Reconsidering the Protection of Child Witnesses and Pre-Recorded Testimony: Comparative Perspectives from Spain and England and Wales

Beatriz Martínez Perpiñá
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

Reconsidering the Protection of Child Witnesses and Pre-Recorded Testimony: Comparative Perspectives from Spain and England and Wales

Beatriz Martínez Perpiñá
article en

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative law analysis between Spain and England and Wales, focusing on pre-recorded evidence as a procedural tool designed to prevent the secondary victimization of underage witnesses in criminal proceedings. In the Spanish system, recorded statements are intended to prevent children from having to repeat their testimony, ensure their protection and preserve the evidential value of their statements. Special measures are taken in England and Wales, such as video-recorded examination and pre-recorded cross-examination. These methods pursue similar objectives by reducing the child’s exposure to the judicial environment. The study identifies the similarities in their protective purpose and the differences that result from procedural structures. It also detects the lessons that each legal system can apply to optimize the use of these instruments and strengthen the protection of children and adolescents.

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual PenalVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon