Shortening the Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU): Development and Validation of a 12-Item Family Satisfaction Survey for Adult ICUs

Objectives: To develop and validate a shorter Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU) questionnaire that reduces survey length while preserving content and psychometric performance for quality improvement and benchmarking. The FS-ICU survey assesses family perceptions of care, communication, and decision-making and has been translated into multiple languages with implementation across diverse health care systems internationally. In a province-wide electronic implementation in Ontario, more than 40% of initiated surveys were incomplete, suggesting that survey length may limit practicality for large-scale quality improvement and benchmarking. Design: Multistage study using provincial FS-ICU survey data and an independent multicenter validation dataset for item reduction, psychometric evaluation, agreement testing, and external validation of a shortened questionnaire. Setting: A 12-member expert working group, convened for a Critical Care Services Ontario initiative, used provincial web-based data from adult ICUs across Ontario to develop a shorter version, FS-ICUshort. External validation was applied to FS-ICUshort using a separate multicenter Canadian revised FS-ICU dataset. Participants: A 12-member expert working group led by Dr. Daren K. Heyland, including administrative staff, ICU clinical staff, patient experience specialists, and quality improvement specialists from Ontario, used provincial FS-ICU rollout data. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Using empirical criteria and expert ratings, the FS-ICU was reduced from 29 to 12 items: seven in the satisfaction-with-care domain (FS-Care) and five in the communication and decision-making domain (FS-DM). FS-ICUshort showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.93 for FS-Care, 0.86 for FS-DM, and 0.94 for total). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor structure with better fit than a single-factor model. Scores from FS-ICUshort closely matched full FS-ICU, with mean differences less than or equal to 1.1 points on a 0–100 scale and intraclass correlations of 0.97–0.99. External validation replicated these results. Conclusions: The 12-item FS-ICUshort maintains the core content and psychometric quality of the original FS-ICU while significantly reducing length, supporting routine use in ICU family experience measurement and benchmarking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007394
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Shortening the Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU): Development and Validation of a 12-Item Family Satisfaction Survey for Adult ICUs

Renisha Iruthayanathan, Daren Keith Heyland, Andrew G. Day, David Neilipovitz et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Shortening the Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU): Development and Validation of a 12-Item Family Satisfaction Survey for Adult ICUs

Renisha Iruthayanathan, Daren Keith Heyland, Andrew G. Day, David Neilipovitz, Andrew Wincen, Nancy Xisto
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a shorter Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU) questionnaire that reduces survey length while preserving content and psychometric performance for quality improvement and benchmarking. The FS-ICU survey assesses family perceptions of care, communication, and decision-making and has been translated into multiple languages with implementation across diverse health care systems internationally. In a province-wide electronic implementation in Ontario, more than 40% of initiated surveys were incomplete, suggesting that survey length may limit practicality for large-scale quality improvement and benchmarking. Design: Multistage study using provincial FS-ICU survey data and an independent multicenter validation dataset for item reduction, psychometric evaluation, agreement testing, and external validation of a shortened questionnaire. Setting: A 12-member expert working group, convened for a Critical Care Services Ontario initiative, used provincial web-based data from adult ICUs across Ontario to develop a shorter version, FS-ICUshort. External validation was applied to FS-ICUshort using a separate multicenter Canadian revised FS-ICU dataset. Participants: A 12-member expert working group led by Dr. Daren K. Heyland, including administrative staff, ICU clinical staff, patient experience specialists, and quality improvement specialists from Ontario, used provincial FS-ICU rollout data. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Using empirical criteria and expert ratings, the FS-ICU was reduced from 29 to 12 items: seven in the satisfaction-with-care domain (FS-Care) and five in the communication and decision-making domain (FS-DM). FS-ICUshort showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.93 for FS-Care, 0.86 for FS-DM, and 0.94 for total). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a two-factor structure with better fit than a single-factor model. Scores from FS-ICUshort closely matched full FS-ICU, with mean differences less than or equal to 1.1 points on a 0–100 scale and intraclass correlations of 0.97–0.99. External validation replicated these results. Conclusions: The 12-item FS-ICUshort maintains the core content and psychometric quality of the original FS-ICU while significantly reducing length, supporting routine use in ICU family experience measurement and benchmarking.

Critical Care Medicine
University of Ottawa (CA), Queen's University (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Kingston Health Sciences Centre (CA), Ontario Health (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon