Cost-effectiveness of atosiban versus placebo for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL 8 trial)

Background To assess the cost-effectiveness of treatment with atosiban compared to placebo for threatened preterm birth from 30 +0 to 33 +6 weeks of gestation. Methods We performed an economic evaluation from a societal perspective alongside the multicentre randomised controlled APOSTEL 8 trial, including 755 participants with threatened preterm birth from 30 +0 to 33 +6 weeks of gestation who were randomised to atosiban or placebo, of whom 752 (884 infants) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Costs, collected between randomisation and three months corrected child age, were measured using a combination of hospital records and the self-reported iMTA Medical and Productivity Cost Questionnaires and estimated at infant level. The main outcome measure was cost-effectiveness expressed in terms of incremental cost per severe adverse neonatal outcome prevented. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to handle missing data. Non-parametric bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty surrounding incremental cost-effectiveness outcomes. Findings The difference in mean costs between the atosiban group (€40,743.1) and the placebo group (€40,793.6) was not statistically significant (mean difference: -€50.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) −4037.6 to 3936.7). The incremental cost per severe adverse neonatal outcome prevented was dominant (-€5286.6), falling in the south-east quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane, indicating cost-savings and reduced severe adverse neonatal outcomes by atosiban. However, the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were distributed across all four quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane, indicating high uncertainty surrounding cost-effectiveness estimates. The probability of cost-effectiveness of atosiban reached 50% at a willingness to pay threshold of €33,023.3 per severe adverse neonatal outcome prevented. Interpretation This economic evaluation did not demonstrate that atosiban is a cost-effective treatment for threatened PTB from 30 +0 to 33 +6 weeks gestation. In addition to the absence of clinical benefit, our findings show no economic advantage, further discouraging its routine use at this gestational age. These results contribute to optimizing evidence-based management of threatened preterm birth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347475
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Cost-effectiveness of atosiban versus placebo for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL 8 trial)

Judith Ekkina Bosmans, Larissa I. van der Windt, Carolien Roos, Job Klumper et al.
PLoS ONE
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Cost-effectiveness of atosiban versus placebo for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL 8 trial)

Judith Ekkina Bosmans, Larissa I. van der Windt, Carolien Roos, Job Klumper, Joris van der Post, Kate F. Walker, Martijn Alexander Oudijk, Stavros Petrou, Ben Willem Mol, Tobias Nijman
article en

Abstract

Background To assess the cost-effectiveness of treatment with atosiban compared to placebo for threatened preterm birth from 30 +0 to 33 +6 weeks of gestation. Methods We performed an economic evaluation from a societal perspective alongside the multicentre randomised controlled APOSTEL 8 trial, including 755 participants with threatened preterm birth from 30 +0 to 33 +6 weeks of gestation who were randomised to atosiban or placebo, of whom 752 (884 infants) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Costs, collected between randomisation and three months corrected child age, were measured using a combination of hospital records and the self-reported iMTA Medical and Productivity Cost Questionnaires and estimated at infant level. The main outcome measure was cost-effectiveness expressed in terms of incremental cost per severe adverse neonatal outcome prevented. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to handle missing data. Non-parametric bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty surrounding incremental cost-effectiveness outcomes. Findings The difference in mean costs between the atosiban group (€40,743.1) and the placebo group (€40,793.6) was not statistically significant (mean difference: -€50.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) −4037.6 to 3936.7). The incremental cost per severe adverse neonatal outcome prevented was dominant (-€5286.6), falling in the south-east quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane, indicating cost-savings and reduced severe adverse neonatal outcomes by atosiban. However, the bootstrapped cost-effect pairs were distributed across all four quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane, indicating high uncertainty surrounding cost-effectiveness estimates. The probability of cost-effectiveness of atosiban reached 50% at a willingness to pay threshold of €33,023.3 per severe adverse neonatal outcome prevented. Interpretation This economic evaluation did not demonstrate that atosiban is a cost-effective treatment for threatened PTB from 30 +0 to 33 +6 weeks gestation. In addition to the absence of clinical benefit, our findings show no economic advantage, further discouraging its routine use at this gestational age. These results contribute to optimizing evidence-based management of threatened preterm birth.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(11)
University of Nottingham (GB), Utrecht University (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), University of Oxford (GB), Queen's Medical Centre (GB), Amsterdam Reproduction Development (NL), Monash University (AU), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon