Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers for Biomedical Interfaces: Polymer Selection, Architecture, Bioactivation, and Translational Challenges

Electrospun nanofibers provide high surface area, interconnected porosity, and extracellular-matrix-like architectures that can be combined with controlled degradation, local therapeutic delivery, and surface biofunctionalization. This review examines bioactive electrospun materials from a materials-design perspective, focusing on the relationships among polymer selection, electrospinning conditions, fiber architecture, bioactive-agent localization, and application-specific performance. Synthetic biodegradable polymers, natural and bio-derived polymers, and hybrid systems are discussed together with random, aligned, multilayer, and core–shell architectures. Bioactivation strategies include direct incorporation of therapeutic agents or functional nanophases, core–shell localization for payload protection and release control, surface functionalization, endogenous-factor recruitment, and stimulus-responsive activation. Three biomedical interfaces are considered as contrasting application models: wound dressings, urological repair, and implant or biomedical-device coatings. Their comparison highlights distinct requirements related to hydration, mechanical loading, microbial exposure, tissue interaction, coating–substrate integrity, and functional lifetime. Particular attention is given to wet-state stability, preservation of bioactive function, sterilization, manufacturing reproducibility, and validation against application-specific failure modes. Overall, the assessment of electrospun biomedical materials should extend beyond as-fabricated morphology and bioactive-agent incorporation to establish whether structural, interfacial, and biological functions are retained under application-relevant conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18212750
Primary Topic
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers for Biomedical Interfaces: Polymer Selection, Architecture, Bioactivation, and Translational Challenges

Maria Gabriella Santonicola, Gianluca Ciarleglio
Polymers
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
article

Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers for Biomedical Interfaces: Polymer Selection, Architecture, Bioactivation, and Translational Challenges

Maria Gabriella Santonicola, Gianluca Ciarleglio
article en

Abstract

Electrospun nanofibers provide high surface area, interconnected porosity, and extracellular-matrix-like architectures that can be combined with controlled degradation, local therapeutic delivery, and surface biofunctionalization. This review examines bioactive electrospun materials from a materials-design perspective, focusing on the relationships among polymer selection, electrospinning conditions, fiber architecture, bioactive-agent localization, and application-specific performance. Synthetic biodegradable polymers, natural and bio-derived polymers, and hybrid systems are discussed together with random, aligned, multilayer, and core–shell architectures. Bioactivation strategies include direct incorporation of therapeutic agents or functional nanophases, core–shell localization for payload protection and release control, surface functionalization, endogenous-factor recruitment, and stimulus-responsive activation. Three biomedical interfaces are considered as contrasting application models: wound dressings, urological repair, and implant or biomedical-device coatings. Their comparison highlights distinct requirements related to hydration, mechanical loading, microbial exposure, tissue interaction, coating–substrate integrity, and functional lifetime. Particular attention is given to wet-state stability, preservation of bioactive function, sterilization, manufacturing reproducibility, and validation against application-specific failure modes. Overall, the assessment of electrospun biomedical materials should extend beyond as-fabricated morphology and bioactive-agent incorporation to establish whether structural, interfacial, and biological functions are retained under application-relevant conditions.

PolymersVol. 18(21)
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon