A 3D CBCT-Based Approach to Assessing Effective Radiation Penetration Depth in Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy

Background/Objectives: Accurate characterization of treatment geometry is essential for intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOeRT) treatment planning. Mobile cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables volumetric assessment of intraoperative anatomy beyond conventional point-based measurements. This study compared clinically applied distance measurement techniques with geometric distance descriptors retrospectively extracted from comprehensive three-dimensional CBCT datasets. Methods: Ninety-six patients receiving IOeRT as a tumor-bed boost during breast-conserving surgery were included. Manual CBCT measurements (mCBCT) were compared with mean (USavg) and minimum (USmin) ultrasound measurements per patient. Comprehensive 3D distance extraction was performed in 82 CBCT datasets using an approximated thoracic-wall surface as the geometric reference. Minimum and first-quartile distances were evaluated across the complete applicator cross-section and within a 1-cm-diameter inner disk around the central beam axis. Results: The mean paired difference between mCBCT and USavg was 0.3 mm and was not statistically significant, whereas mCBCT measurements exceeded USmin by an average of 1.5 mm. In the principal comparison, the minimum CBCT-derived distance within the inner disk was 1.4 mm smaller than mCBCT. Across the complete applicator area, minimum distances were 9.1-10.7 mm smaller than the clinical measurements. The first-quartile distance across all surface points was 1.4 mm smaller than mCBCT, whereas the corresponding inner-disk difference was not statistically significant after correction. Isodose-atlas-based dose-volume analysis indicated that a 1.5-mm change in assumed penetration depth could correspond to an approximately 7% change in the 90% isodose volume at shallow depths. Conclusions: Clinical CBCT and ultrasound measurements showed small group-level differences but substantial patient-level variability. Comprehensive 3D CBCT analysis revealed spatial variations in tissue depth not fully represented by the clinical measurements, highlighting the limitations of characterizing treatment geometry using a single distance. Although anatomical accuracy and patient-specific dosimetric consequences remain to be established, these findings support the potential of intraoperative 3D CBCT to advance IOeRT toward individualized, image-guided treatment planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16213664
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A 3D CBCT-Based Approach to Assessing Effective Radiation Penetration Depth in Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy

Philipp Scherer, Johannes Berchtold, Christoph Fussl, Christoph Gaisberger et al.
Diagnostics
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

A 3D CBCT-Based Approach to Assessing Effective Radiation Penetration Depth in Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy

Philipp Scherer, Johannes Berchtold, Christoph Fussl, Christoph Gaisberger, Gerd Fastner, Ivan Messner, Markus Stana, Andreas Sir, Brane Grambozov, N Scharle, Matthias Mattke, Julia Kaiser, Sara Vockner, Klarissa Ellmauer, Falk Röder
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accurate characterization of treatment geometry is essential for intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOeRT) treatment planning. Mobile cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables volumetric assessment of intraoperative anatomy beyond conventional point-based measurements. This study compared clinically applied distance measurement techniques with geometric distance descriptors retrospectively extracted from comprehensive three-dimensional CBCT datasets. Methods: Ninety-six patients receiving IOeRT as a tumor-bed boost during breast-conserving surgery were included. Manual CBCT measurements (mCBCT) were compared with mean (USavg) and minimum (USmin) ultrasound measurements per patient. Comprehensive 3D distance extraction was performed in 82 CBCT datasets using an approximated thoracic-wall surface as the geometric reference. Minimum and first-quartile distances were evaluated across the complete applicator cross-section and within a 1-cm-diameter inner disk around the central beam axis. Results: The mean paired difference between mCBCT and USavg was 0.3 mm and was not statistically significant, whereas mCBCT measurements exceeded USmin by an average of 1.5 mm. In the principal comparison, the minimum CBCT-derived distance within the inner disk was 1.4 mm smaller than mCBCT. Across the complete applicator area, minimum distances were 9.1-10.7 mm smaller than the clinical measurements. The first-quartile distance across all surface points was 1.4 mm smaller than mCBCT, whereas the corresponding inner-disk difference was not statistically significant after correction. Isodose-atlas-based dose-volume analysis indicated that a 1.5-mm change in assumed penetration depth could correspond to an approximately 7% change in the 90% isodose volume at shallow depths. Conclusions: Clinical CBCT and ultrasound measurements showed small group-level differences but substantial patient-level variability. Comprehensive 3D CBCT analysis revealed spatial variations in tissue depth not fully represented by the clinical measurements, highlighting the limitations of characterizing treatment geometry using a single distance. Although anatomical accuracy and patient-specific dosimetric consequences remain to be established, these findings support the potential of intraoperative 3D CBCT to advance IOeRT toward individualized, image-guided treatment planning.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(21)
Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon