Comparative outcomes of endovascular versus synthetic bypass for isolated superficial femoral artery lesions: A 3-year single-center cohort study

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) ranges from intermittent claudication to critical limb‑threatening ischemia (CLTI), with <3% of intermittent claudication cases progressing to CLTI. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting (PTAS) and synthetic graft femoropopliteal bypass (FPB) in a homogeneous PAD cohort. A subgroup analysis of TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) B and C lesions, which lack standardized treatment algorithms, was also performed. We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with no prior history of vascular interventions in the same limb who were treated for isolated superficial femoral artery lesions between 2016 and 2020 (29 underwent PTAS and 59 underwent FPB). Primary outcomes were reintervention, limb amputation, mortality, and vessel patency (primary, assisted primary, and secondary) over a 3‑year follow‑up. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences in treatment outcomes. No statistically significant differences were detected in reintervention, limb amputation, mortality, or patency between the two treatments. For loss of primary patency, the hazard ratio (HR) for FPB versus PTAS was 1.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–4.69; log-rank p = 0.146) and 1.23 (95% CI, 0.45–3.38) after adjustment for lesion length and TASC grade. In the TASC B and C subgroup, no significant differences were observed in primary, assisted primary, or secondary patency (log-rank p = 0.809, 0.302, and 0.135, respectively). The study was underpowered to detect modest effects (post-hoc power for primary patency, 34.4%). In this small single-center cohort, no statistically significant difference in 3-year outcomes was detected between PTAS and FPB for isolated superficial femoral artery lesions; clinically meaningful differences cannot be excluded, and the findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361589
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Comparative outcomes of endovascular versus synthetic bypass for isolated superficial femoral artery lesions: A 3-year single-center cohort study

Up Huh, Changsung Han, Il Jae Wang, Chung Won Lee et al.
PLoS ONE
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Comparative outcomes of endovascular versus synthetic bypass for isolated superficial femoral artery lesions: A 3-year single-center cohort study

Up Huh, Changsung Han, Il Jae Wang, Chung Won Lee, Miju Bae, Young Jin Tak, Gwon-Min Kim, Jaewon Choi, Chiseung Lee
article en

Abstract

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) ranges from intermittent claudication to critical limb‑threatening ischemia (CLTI), with <3% of intermittent claudication cases progressing to CLTI. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting (PTAS) and synthetic graft femoropopliteal bypass (FPB) in a homogeneous PAD cohort. A subgroup analysis of TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) B and C lesions, which lack standardized treatment algorithms, was also performed. We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients with no prior history of vascular interventions in the same limb who were treated for isolated superficial femoral artery lesions between 2016 and 2020 (29 underwent PTAS and 59 underwent FPB). Primary outcomes were reintervention, limb amputation, mortality, and vessel patency (primary, assisted primary, and secondary) over a 3‑year follow‑up. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences in treatment outcomes. No statistically significant differences were detected in reintervention, limb amputation, mortality, or patency between the two treatments. For loss of primary patency, the hazard ratio (HR) for FPB versus PTAS was 1.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–4.69; log-rank p = 0.146) and 1.23 (95% CI, 0.45–3.38) after adjustment for lesion length and TASC grade. In the TASC B and C subgroup, no significant differences were observed in primary, assisted primary, or secondary patency (log-rank p = 0.809, 0.302, and 0.135, respectively). The study was underpowered to detect modest effects (post-hoc power for primary patency, 34.4%). In this small single-center cohort, no statistically significant difference in 3-year outcomes was detected between PTAS and FPB for isolated superficial femoral artery lesions; clinically meaningful differences cannot be excluded, and the findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(11)
Pusan National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon