Effects of perceptual salience and task load on executive vigilance: Independent and interacting effects without modulation of the vigilance decrement.

Objective: To examine the independent and interacting effects of perceptual salience and task load on executive vigilance performance, as well as whether these factors modulate the vigilance decrement over time.Background: Hits in vigilance tasks typically decline with time-on-task. This decrement is explained by the resource depletion of attentional resources (overload model) or to disengagement caused by task-unrelated thoughts (underload model). Previous research manipulated salience or task load separately, yielding inconsistent findings. Moreover, few studies have examined both factors simultaneously while holding other task parameters constant.Method: Two preregistered studies and a pooled data analysis were conducted using the ANTI-Vea task, which assesses attention and vigilance components. In Study 1 (N = 84), perceptual salience of the target stimulus was manipulated between participants. In Study 2 (N = 45), perceptual salience and task load were orthogonally manipulated within participants. Study 3 reanalyzed combined data (N = 238) from Studies 1 and 2 together with data from previous research.Results: Executive vigilance showed significant effects of perceptual salience and task load, with larger overall accuracy observed for the most salient targets and under moderate task load (dual-task condition). In signal detection measures, A′ was largest for the most salient targets, whereas moderate task load was associated with a less conservative response bias (B″). However, neither variable modulated the observed vigilance decrement over time.Conclusion: Perceptual salience and task load affect overall executive vigilance but do not modulate its decrement over time-on-task. Application: Findings may inform the design of tasks and systems that optimize vigilance by promoting an optimal balance of task demands, by considering perceptual salience and task load to minimize failures and reduce the risk of vigilance decrement-related accidents.Keywords: Vigilance, Executive vigilance, Perceptual salience, Task load, Vigilance decrement Précis: This study examined how perceptual salience and task load influence executive vigilance using the ANTI-Vea task. Across two preregistered studies and a pooled data analysis, overall performance varied across levels of task load and perceptual salience, but such manipulations did not modulate vigilance loss over time-on-task. Findings contribute to a fine-grained understanding of task-related factors that affect vigilance performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tm8e4
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Effects of perceptual salience and task load on executive vigilance: Independent and interacting effects without modulation of the vigilance decrement.

Pablo Barttfeld, Elisa Martín‐Arévalo, Juan Lupiáñez, Klara Hemmerich et al.
Mind wandering and attention
preprint

Effects of perceptual salience and task load on executive vigilance: Independent and interacting effects without modulation of the vigilance decrement.

Pablo Barttfeld, Elisa Martín‐Arévalo, Juan Lupiáñez, Klara Hemmerich, María Julieta Aguirre, Fernando Gabriel Luna, Damián Baños Sáez
preprint en

Abstract

Objective: To examine the independent and interacting effects of perceptual salience and task load on executive vigilance performance, as well as whether these factors modulate the vigilance decrement over time.Background: Hits in vigilance tasks typically decline with time-on-task. This decrement is explained by the resource depletion of attentional resources (overload model) or to disengagement caused by task-unrelated thoughts (underload model). Previous research manipulated salience or task load separately, yielding inconsistent findings. Moreover, few studies have examined both factors simultaneously while holding other task parameters constant.Method: Two preregistered studies and a pooled data analysis were conducted using the ANTI-Vea task, which assesses attention and vigilance components. In Study 1 (N = 84), perceptual salience of the target stimulus was manipulated between participants. In Study 2 (N = 45), perceptual salience and task load were orthogonally manipulated within participants. Study 3 reanalyzed combined data (N = 238) from Studies 1 and 2 together with data from previous research.Results: Executive vigilance showed significant effects of perceptual salience and task load, with larger overall accuracy observed for the most salient targets and under moderate task load (dual-task condition). In signal detection measures, A′ was largest for the most salient targets, whereas moderate task load was associated with a less conservative response bias (B″). However, neither variable modulated the observed vigilance decrement over time.Conclusion: Perceptual salience and task load affect overall executive vigilance but do not modulate its decrement over time-on-task. Application: Findings may inform the design of tasks and systems that optimize vigilance by promoting an optimal balance of task demands, by considering perceptual salience and task load to minimize failures and reduce the risk of vigilance decrement-related accidents.Keywords: Vigilance, Executive vigilance, Perceptual salience, Task load, Vigilance decrement Précis: This study examined how perceptual salience and task load influence executive vigilance using the ANTI-Vea task. Across two preregistered studies and a pooled data analysis, overall performance varied across levels of task load and perceptual salience, but such manipulations did not modulate vigilance loss over time-on-task. Findings contribute to a fine-grained understanding of task-related factors that affect vigilance performance.

Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon